Pages

Thursday, October 29, 2009

BOE Debate at City Hall

A debate last night with the candidates for the Norwalk Board of Education gave approximately two hundred voters a final opportunity to hear from the incumbents and their challengers firsthand. During the one and a half hour debate the eight candidates were asked six questions.

With only four days left until the election the candidates spoke about board transparency, defining high standards, over populated schools,  their ideal superintendent, special education, and budget priorities. 

"The debate definitely changed my mind," said Jane Robillard, a parent in the audience after the debate.  "For example, I didn't know that special education was such a big issue.  I want someone on the board who is going to pay attention to that."

BOE Board Chair Rosa Murray repeatedly described the difference between the boards policy making role and the administration's operational role and that the two were being confused.   Sal Corda's name came up several times during the debate by both Republicans and Democrats.  In addition there was considerable time spent on the problems and  high cost of special education in the district. 

The first topic addressed at the debate was about the importance of transparency.  Candidates were asked about specific ways they would  increase transparency at the board level. Most candidates interpreted the question to be about the need for communication between the BOE and parents which has become one of the major themes of this election.

Heidi Keyes, a Democrat running for the first time and Shirley Mosby, an Democratic incumbent, suggested methods like newsletters and emails to parents would increase the effectiveness of communication.  Erin  Halsey,  a Republican concurred by saying technology could be harnessed.  Sue Haynie, a Republican candidate suggested filming and televising the BOE meetings, holding more informational sessions for parents, and creating budget summaries so that the budget process would be clearer.

However Republicans Steve Colarossi and Artie Kassimis went on the attack criticizing the current BOE members for not answering e-mails and phone calls made by parents and other individuals. This prompted Ms. Murray, a Democrat, to respond that new superintendent should make a communication plan since the board is policy making body.  Amy Jimenez, also a Democrat,  countered by saying that the BOE members cannot respond as individuals to questions. She said that the BOE was a body of nine members and needed to act and speak with a single voice.

The candidates had a tougher time answering the next question about how to set and define "high standards" for the Norwalk school district.   Ms. Keyes and Mr. Colarossi emphasized the importance of early childhood education. Mr. Kassimis said that teachers needed to be engaged more and that as education experts they would know how to raise standards. Ms. Haynie spoke about need to go beyond state standard of  "compliance." She said compliance was not a high enough standard.

Ms. Murray said that the district has been implementing school improvement plans throughout the district by using data teams and improving the quality of after school programs. Ms. Jimenez said that she has been deeply involved in raising the bar.  Through performance plans Norwalk schools are plotting their progress she said. She believes that the NCLB is not leaving and that it requires that students make continual progress. Democrat Shirley Mosby spoke about the fact that several schools made sufficient progress to enter safe harbor status and the importance of differentiated learning.  In response to Ms. Haynie, she said "we need to keep in compliance" in order to eligible for state funds. 

The third question had to do with over crowded schools. The moderator noted that some classrooms were empty while others were bursting at the seams. Ms. Haynie said that schools that had good before and after school programs tended to be in high demand. Mr. Kassimis said the fault lay with the BOE for not anticipating shifts in population and increasing enrollment.

Ms. Jimenez said that the children she knew at Jefferson loved the portable classrooms and that the portables were a responsible way to address the overcrowding problem. She added that a study was commissioned in October to analyze enrollment and facilities planning at the elementary schools.  Ms. Mosby said that the public needs to get involved with the Board of Estimation and Taxation where the budget for capital expenditures is set.  Ms. Keyes said the portables are a short term solutions and that the BOE needs to think about the possibility of expansion longer term.

There was  much agreement when it came time to talk about the qualifications of the ideal superintendent.  The candidates wanted a great leader who loves Norwalk and its diversity.  "We are looking for someone who has the heart of Norwalk,"  said Ms. Murray.

Many candidates said it was important that he or she be visible in the community and be a strong communicator. 

Sal Corda's name came up several time during this part of the debate. "Some of the current board members did vote for Sal Corda," said Ms. Halsey.

Ms. Mosby replied that although she was not on the board at the time of the hiring, Sal Corda was hired to revamp the curicullum, an area of weakness at the time of his hiring.  "He did his job, but things have changed now," she said.  Ms. Jimenez added that the current board voted 9-0 to not renew Mr. Corda's contract.

Steve Colarossi lamented that it has taken four months for the current board to pick a search firm and that the board should be in charge of collecting community feedback, not the search firm.  Community forums have been scheduled for early November.

There was also considerable discussion at the debate about special education. The Republican candidates questioned why there is $400,000 budgeted to fight lawsuits related to services for special education children.  They stated that according to the 2008 CREC report there is a lack of urgency around special education and that there are serious problems in the district.  They brought up the incident with Spectrum Kids, LLC a special education services company that was hired without verification of the credentials of its owners and with which a litigation ensued. 

The Democratic candidates said that the Spectrum Kids incident was the fault of the administration.  Ms. Mosby said that it was the Board who commissioned the CREC report and are diligently working towards addressing problems in special education.

Finally, the candidates were asked to identify two items that they would fight for in the current budget and two items for reduction.  Most of the candidates said they would want to "protect the classroom" by not eliminating any services that affect children in the classroom  Ms. Jimenez said that she would look for more public-private partnerships, using the Norwalk High pool as an example.   Ms. Haynie said that Special Education makes up 20 percent of the budget and she would look for savings there.

Several of the candidates talked about the need for more consolidation between city and school services in places like the mailroom and the potential of recycling.  Mr. Kassimis said the district needs to use technology to improve efficiency and save money.

Were you there?  Did this event help you to make up your mind about whom to vote for?

11 comments:

  1. Yes was in attendence, yes with what little was allowed to be presented it was somewhat helpful, to some degree.

    Communication, Special Education, sounds like foresight and wisdom? Planing for an explosion in growth? We cant even get the class size right some 60 days in.

    Superintendent?

    Hell yeah we need a super to come in and kick butt. Who is getting my pick to pick the super?

    Colorossi,Haynie,Jimenez,and Mosby.

    Each brings their own unique perspective and skills.

    Steve is a trained lawyer and is actively involved in eduacation. Check.

    Sue, anyone thats been paying attention, Sue needs no intro. Check.

    Amy? anyone more passionate? Check.

    Shirley, our ever ready battery, takes the hits and keeps on keeping on, chin held high. Double check.

    Okay, thats not allowed. Check.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes.
    I support the Democrats. The more I hear, the more I believe the Republican candidates are playing the 'Politics as Usual' campaign. Sue Haynie cutting Special Education funding? No way!
    There certainly is a lot of emphasis in this debate about Special Education. The money set aside for lawsuits needs an answer, but one from the administration. I think voters would be interested in their answer!
    I also heard about how parennts make their choicer for schools based on the after school programs. Big surprise! Another positive for Naramake School. How many of these candidates on the ticket are from that school? You want communication, ask them to reveal their payroll records from their after school program....Let's see how communicative some of these candidates are.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Umpire, interesting combination. I'm glad that you would look at the candidates individually and not just vote Democrat or Republican across the board.

    However, be careful what you wish for? As one of my college professors always told me, look at what they do, not just what they say!

    Out of all of the incumbents, Rosa Murray is most experienced and I would not just dismiss that. She is thoughtful and articulate and can give some experience to, (in my opinion) what will be at least 3 new BOE members. I think the incumbents put too much stock in Corda and he let this City down. The incumbents may have to live with that bad decision with the election results.

    It is time to move on in a new direction. I think with the retention of some experienced member(s) and addition of some new blood, it should make this post election board more energized to tackle some of the issues facing the BOE.

    PS: To the post election BOE, put the election behind you and move forward. Roll up your sleeves, work together, communicate with the parents and teachers and with each other and find solutions to the educational problems that face this City.

    ReplyDelete
  4. From reading the seventh paragraph, one would conclude:

    The Republican candidates (Colarossi and Kassimis) believe Board of Education members should repond to all e-mails and telephone calls from constituents;

    The Democratic candidates (Murray and Jimenez) believe BOE members should NOT respond to e-mails or phone calls because the BOE is a "policy making" body that must speak with "one voice."

    The Common Council is a policy making body for the city's non-educational issues. Like Board members, they are elected officials. Imagine a Council member arguing that he or she cannot respond to communications from the public because the Council is a "policy making" body and must speak with "one voice."

    ReplyDelete
  5. If the BOE "speaks with one voice" what is the point of electing 9 members? There is no excuse for the current members who sat by and did nothing as our schools fell into disarray. The special education disaster is shameful. They have done nothing to implement the CREC recomendations, yet set aside $400,000 in taxpayer money to use against parents of special education children? Does anyone else see a problem with this? The central office special education staff has failed. They have proven that they are not capable of budgeting or managing. Why are they still allowed to mismanage that department and our tax money? Why were they never held accountable? Why does Norwalk need 5 people to run that department? Most systems have 2. How much longer will this be allowed to continue? Why has the current BOE members allowed this to happen. Time for a change! Colarossi and Kassimis earned my vote!

    ReplyDelete
  6. As a newcomer to the whole Board of Education thing, it was a bit difficult to figure out all of the innuendos of the debate--ie. Shirley Mosby shaking her head and whispering that you can't do that when Steve Colarossi spoke--it's difficult to understand what the incumbents know from being on the board of ed and how important that is. My hunch is to vote for the people I thought to be the smartest--Sue Haynie, Steve Calarossi, Amy Jimenez and Cassamis. I am inclined to think that the newcomers will figure it out once they are elected. The idea of bringing in some new blood at this point seems exciting and change bringing. The idea of keeping the incumbents on the board seems like we're not jumping at our one chance for change.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Amy Jimenez is smart but she acts the role of a know-it-all who has too often demonstrated little respect for those who disagree with her views. That isn't the way to mend the damage that has been done to this board and to the Norwalk community.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anyone who wants to read, for themselves, how the BOE treated parents of SN kids and the Special Ed dept hired someone with no experience, no credentials and (most amazingly) no background check, to run the Spectrum Kids (autism) project, can simply read the minutes from a board meeting in 2008. When you read the parent accounts of the regression in their children and the taxpayer $ that was literally wasted, you might weep.
    http://www.norwalkpublicschools.org/show/announcement/1200

    ReplyDelete
  9. I wasn't at the debate but just read Sue Haynie's letter to editor in today's hour and I want to compliment her in trying to raise the bar in Norwalk. This school district is so obsessed with compliance to the middle which is not high enough. Raise the bar for the entire district to motivate ALL CHILDREN at ALL levels to succeed. IF you look at the District's growth plan - on the Norwalk School website - nowhere does it talk about challenging or increasing scores for children
    above the goal level - and I have quickly seen in my own children how this focus on the middle breeds a standard of mediocrity where children learn to get by with just doing the bare minimum. It is time for the Norwalk Board of Ed and administration to reach higher for all of the children in the city.

    ReplyDelete
  10. In my opinion you will not find anyone as committed to understanding the issues behind education, on both a local and national level, as Sue Haynie. She has children who have been in Special Ed and became an expert at guiding their education- then shared that knowledge. She saw inefficiencies in the special ed system which didn't result in children progressing. Change is needed and Sue will see to it. She has my vote. The Dems have had their chance and are speaking up about their ideas at the 9th hour. I'm not impressed.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Eliminate ALL the incumbent DUMBOCRATS with ONE VOTE who have wasted MILLIONS of tax dollars with Corda and the putrid Central ORIFICE.

    ReplyDelete

ShareThis