Pages

Thursday, July 14, 2011

CMTs Rise Across the Board

The city’s 2011 Connecticut Mastery Test results are full of good news. The test results, which were released Wednesday, show gains over last year — in some cases, jumps of more than 5 percentage points — in math, reading and writing at several grade levels. Since 2006, the test results show double-digit improvements in various subjects and grades.
“I’m encouraged by the CMT results,” says Superintendent Susan Marks. “We are moving in a positive direction.”

Marks points out that this year, one in three elementary school students attained the top level of advanced in math. In middle school, one in four students reached the advanced level in math.

“I’m especially glad that we are moving our students into the advanced category,” she says. Although most of the CMT results focus on proficiency and goal level results, Marks says the district should be aiming for advanced levels.

Marks praised the marked improvement in middle school scores this year, especially in grade 6 and 8. In grade 6, goal math scores jumped to 60.5 percent from 53.3 percent. In eighth grade, that number went to 62.2 percent from 53.9 percent — 8 percentage points higher. In reading, grade 8 students went from 61 percent at goal last year to 66.5 percent this year. Grade 8 writing scores also jumped more than 10 percentage points from last year to 57.1 percent at goal this year.

“We weren’t talking so positively about the middle school scores last year,” says Marks. “There have been a lot of focused strategies on literacy and math in the middle schools.”

Diane Filardo, Norwalk schools’ testing specialist, says the gap between Norwalk and the state’s scores is closing. “In some areas, Norwalk surpasses the state proficiency levels.” In third grade math, for example, there is less than a point difference between goal levels between Norwalk and the state

Filardo, who is just beginning to disaggregate the data by ethnicity and special needs students, says that that she is seeing positive results from the city's Hispanic and free and reduced lunch population. "Hispanic students are meeting proficiency at higher levels and outperforming their peers in the state."

The results of the CAPT – the Connecticut Academic Performance Test — taken by high school sophomores are less impressive than the CMT scores. “They were more flat than we would have liked,” says Marks noting that the high schools need more support.

The CMT and CAPT are administered annually in March to students across Connecticut. They test math, reading and writing. Grades 5, 8 and 10 are also tested in science. The test was taken by 250,000 children statewide and has five levels of performance for each content area: below basic, basic, proficient, goal and advanced. The federal government uses the CMT and CAPT to measure yearly progress under the No Child Left Behind law.

CMT, percentage of students at or above goal:  2006, 2010, 2011

Grade 3

Math, 47.4, 64, 62.5

Reading, 45.7, 51.4, 51.9

Writing 52.8, 56.3, 56.4

Grade 4

Math, 43.6, 62.3, 66

Reading, 45.6, 53.6, 54.9

Writing, 51.7, 59.2, 62.3

Grade 5

Math, 51.3, 68.1, 70.9

Reading, 53.1, 54.8, 57.4

Writing, 60.2, 65.1, 65.1

Grade 6

Math, 47, 53.3, 60.5

Reading, 57.2, 66, 67.8

Writing, 55.6, 50.7, 54.1

Grade 7

Math, 40.1, 63.3, 62.5

Reading, 56.5, 70.8, 74

Writing, 46.3, 48.9, 50.1

Grade 8

Math, 42.4, 53.9, 62.7

Reading, 57.4, 60.9, 66.5

Writing, 54.4, 45.4, 57.1

39 comments:

  1. Thank goodness, I'm so glad to finally see this district is not settling for 'proficiency' on the CMT but rather Advanced and Goal. Keep raising that bar.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm another parent/taxpayer who really appreciates that Dr. Marks keeps focusing on rigor, raising the bar, and aiming for Advanced, not just shooting for the middle.

    ReplyDelete
  3. ditto, about time.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Excuse me, but Dr. Marks is not responsible for these gains. These gains are the result of long, hard work by teachers and administrators over the last few years. The gains are as a result of the Asst. Superintendent in charge of Curriculum who instituted the CALI method and worked with the State Department of Education for this period of time. Let's get real and remember no superintendent is going to get these gains just by being here one year. Congratulations to all those who have worked so hard these last years.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I was referring to the comment that Norwalk should be aiming for Advanced levels. That's not something heard very often before. Not looking to insult anyone just stating a fact.

    ReplyDelete
  6. 1:27 - The Assistant Superintendent "instituted the CALI method"? Are you out of your mind?

    First of all, he had nothing to do with developing CALI, which is not a "method," but a series of professional development programs and a prescribed set of processes that the CT State Department of Education developed over time, some of it with high power consultants of national rank. And no, that wouldn't include the Assistant Superintendent. It didn't start in Norwalk, and the Assistant Superintendent isn't responsible for bringing it to Norwalk. The state made it clear that it was expected that Norwalk would do it.

    Stop pitching for making him the next superintendent after you finish trashing Dr. Marks.

    ReplyDelete
  7. 4:14, why don't you ask the State Department of Education who made sure the CALI model (sorry, I meant model in the first place) was a part of why Norwalk made such gains in the CMTs? Ask the State Department who should be getting the credit!
    And, no, I am not trashing Susan Marks. She doesn't need my help in digging herself into a deeper hole. I have no desire to trash her and no desire to see anyone in particular replace her. You have your own agenda. I am just stating it as I see it. If you feel the need to discredit me, that's your problem.

    ReplyDelete
  8. 1:27: In fairness to Dr.Marks, she did say to me when I interviewed her that the gains are the result of the hard work of teacher, principals and staff. I did not include that quote in my story.

    ReplyDelete
  9. 4:14 - Whether or not I agree with everything she says and does is of no matter, but I do believe that Dr. Marks is an educator and a leader. Norwalk ought to embrace its superintendent, who is navigating waters in Norwalk that are infested with people who would bring down anyone in their way.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I applaud Dr. Marks on setting the bar higher, the teachers for their hard work and the STUDENTS on this achievement!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Its Sad, 1:27pm that you point out that Dr. Marks had nothing to do with the test scores, yet she was easily faulted and blamed for what is taking place today - a mess that administrators also played a role in. While, I too believe that the positive results came from the hard work of teachers and administrators that care, lets not be so quick to disgrace Dr. Marks on this. Dr. Marks walked into a chaotic situation - situation that has been in existance for some time. I mean, c'mon were you actually expecting Superman? Tell Me something, since I'm sure you have the answer - where was the Asst. superintendent during the budget process? What did he fight for? Where was he when Dr. Marks was making these hard decisions - he never went public with any concerns or made an effort to speak up on all those 'bad' decisions. You honestly think that she was going to make a drastic change within a year - really! How can someone make such change with incompetent Central Office personnel? What she did no one else could of done or atleast tried to! To most of you - Dr. Marks is all talk, give her more time and then judge her!

    ReplyDelete
  12. While I didn't agree with Sal Corda on much, I was alarmed when the board of education disregarded his recommendation for assistant superintendent and appointed Mr. Daddona instead. Is it spelled E-M-P-T-Y S-U-I-T? And I don't mean the former superintendent.

    The board not only saddled the new superintendent with this man, but it even gave him a three-year contract, something the board had been unwilling to give the previous superintendent, a woman who had some serious interpersonal shortcomings, but who at least had a good understanding of curriculum and instruction.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I have strong suspicions about who is behind much of the criticism of Dr. Marks, and it is person who should be one of her strongest supports. Unfortunately, he is an empty suit.

    The board of education, whose crowning achievement was appointing an assistant superintendent Sal Corda believed ought not be given the job because he isn't qualified, is as crazy as Bridgeport's board, which at least had the decency to vote itself out of existence. After appointing the assistant superintendent anyway, it then gave him a three year contract, which it has since extended, thereby making it extremely expensive if anyone decides to get rid of him or even eliminate his position in a restructuring. Whatever informs this board's thinking? Is it whoever lobbies them the most?

    If you want to see where the Norwalk Public Schools are headed, just look at Bridgeport's school system.

    ReplyDelete
  14. The Asst. Superintendent certainly was a part of the budget cut process. Perhaps he doesn't take advantage of photo ops, but he is working to improve achievement. While there are empty suits, he is not one of them and don't infer that I am he. I am not.
    There are central office people who fear that the Asst Superintendent will become the next Superintendent...and well they should fear him. He does require accountability. Unfortunately, from what I've heard, he is not interested in the position.

    Those who are in the negative camp who are trying to get rid of the Asst. Supt. for their own purposes, stop trashing him. He is no threat to you, unless you are not doing your job!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  15. How unprofessional to publicly scrap the man who holds the office of the assistant superintendent. Whoever is doing this must be (1)jealous, (2)fearful or just plain ignorant. Duke it out on the streets, but don't dishonor the man in this way. I don't agree with you, but that's another story.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Given his/her indignation, I have to assume that the person who is defending the assistant superintendent is unaware of his extensive history of gossiping and backbiting. He has pushed many under a bus in order to gain status or personal benefit. And before you ask, I have witnessed this myself many times, as have many colleagues.

    As for "unprofessional" behavior because of my daring to "scrap the man who holds the office of the assistant superintendent," he is a public servant. He is not a member of the royal family and he is not the Bishop of Rome, aka the Pope. As such, he ought to be ready to accept public criticism for his performance and behaviors.

    You didn't include enough choices among your possible conclusions about who I might be. I'm not jealous because he doesn't have anything I want. I am not fearful because he has no power over me. You won't find many who regard me as ignorant. I am, however, resentful that the board didn't appoint someone qualified for the position, someone with a good background in curriculum and instruction, as well as a proven record of leadership -- not to be confused with management.

    I have no knowledge of the other candidates, other than the one internal candidate, but the board has the responsibility to do what is right for the students and taxpayers. They didn't owe this man the job merely because he has been in the district for so long.

    Oh, and 11:36, your comment about duking it out on the streets was quite amusing.

    ReplyDelete
  17. As far as the AS "requiring accountability", you've got to be kidding, right? The main problem in Norwalk has been a lack of accountability from the Board on down. This is where Dr. Marks must make inroads--and fast. There isn't much more time for a learning curve here. For what it's worth, I believe you would find far more people in the system that would agree with 12:04's analysis and opinion of the person holding that office. Back to the topic at hand It has always been my experience that any academic gains made over time are a result of the hard work by the folks in the trenches--students, teachers, and enhanced parental involvement. Kudos to all on the improvements made this year, in spite of obstacles that would have made easy excuses.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I agree with the person who said these people were unprofessional who are backstabbing. I would surmise that it is one person who keeps posting all these defamatory comments, since the use of language and phrasing is the same. It is simply unprofessional for 'colleagues' to stab a fellow administrator.
    A simple quote for the colleagues...
    'You can tell more about a person by what he says about others than you can by what others say about him.'

    ReplyDelete
  19. Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people. -Unknown

    Stop the nastiness!

    ReplyDelete
  20. Kids! Let's play nice! It's summer and the test scores (silly stuff, they) actually look good this year. Can't we just enjoy a Kumbaya moment together?

    ReplyDelete
  21. Forget about summer! Forget about Kumbaya! The fact is that the Asst. Superintendent is so unqualified to be the Asst Supt. and the next Supt. He has many friends on the BOE who he talks to everyday. He is not responsible for the improvement in the CMT scores and bringing in CALI. We had the State Dept of Ed bring in CALI because we are a district in need of improvement for many years. What has he done for this district?

    ReplyDelete
  22. As a parent and a taxpayer in this district, we need to stop bashing people. This is not what this website is about. Let's get everyone including the BOE members to support Dr. Marks. They hired her, so they need to let her do her job.

    ReplyDelete
  23. 6:36 Please take your arguments to a therapist. You have a personal gripe and nothing seems to stop your anger. This is disgraceful and frightening to know that someone 'up there' needs anger management therapy.

    ReplyDelete
  24. 6:32 - I don't know who wrote the 6:36 posting, but have you ever considered the possibility that what he/she wrote is true?

    ReplyDelete
  25. 9:18, have you ever considered that I know it is not true? Besides, even if it were true, there is such anger, such persistence, such a need to destroy a person...Something is seriously wrong there.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Let's get back on topic and please,the negative poster stop spitting emotional vitriol at the AS. The emotion behind the negativity speaks volumes.
    Congratulations to all who have had a part in raising test scores.

    ReplyDelete
  27. 6:28 you are right. This thread is supposed to be about test scores. Let's stay on topic. I'll have to shut down the thread if we can't.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Speaking of scores, Dr. Marks and the BOE......I read a great article today in the Norwalk hour.."Foundation discouraged by school board conduct" . You all should read it! NOrwalk Children's foundation is reconsidering funding if tensions continue...they express their concerns with the relationship, or lack of between the BOE and the Superintendant. Sincevwe ate on the topic of leadership, Bravo to the foundation for such great statement and truly evaluating the unstable leadership we have in Norwalk. As a parent, I am patiently waiting for things to change for we all need to work together for the sake of the kids. Parent trigger as it is known in California, is somewhat being used in the Bpt school system - a process that we can learn from and prevent from happening in Norwalk. Politics does not play a role in education.

    ReplyDelete
  29. 5:37pm, I read the article too - it will be interesting on how it all plays out. I also applause Sally Grose on her article written to the editor! Moina, a very interesting thread will be the discussion of the recent survey results from the union. I can't give any merritt to this survey until we see the type of questioned were asked if Dr. Marks. When the Norwalk hour printed such survey result, Bruce Mellion was quoted on the "express of the community" something to that affect, yet only 75 of them answered- how can one consider that as a "community" and how can one validate those results.

    ReplyDelete
  30. 5:37--"Politics does not play a role in education" It would be the best of all possible worlds if this were true, but, alas, it is far from what transpires in the real world. Look to the recent events just uncovered in Atlanta GA re: standardized test cheating for the last 10 years--Only then will you fully realize just how political education can become. If you pay federal income taxes, you pay for the Atlanta debacle almost as much as you pay for the games in Norwalk. Sorry, but it's true.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Norwalk's Children's Foundation is not helping children by threatening to pull funding from them. The foundation members are trying to control members of the BoE by trying to force them to behave in a way that they perceive to be the 'right way', and that is not the business they are in. There are problems in Norwalk, and now the Children's Foundation has become another of the problems.

    ReplyDelete
  32. To the 5:45 poster - A teacher survey conducted at the annual general meeting of the Norwalk Federation of Teachers can hardly represent the teachers of Norwalk! It is an orchestrated performance.

    These are building stewards, under the direction, bias and control of the NFT president, at one of his meetings. To parade this about as the consensus of Norwalk teachers is a travesty.

    To change the topic and get back to the thread, congratulations to the students, staff, and administrators of NPS on the improvement in CMT test scores.

    I would like to ask you all how the instructional specialists supported you?

    ReplyDelete
  33. It would be a great article to hear how the State Dept. of Education feels about the jump in test scores and how they feel it happened. Perhaps they could share with the parents how the CALI model was implemented and how it helped.

    ReplyDelete
  34. The instructional specialist for reading gives workshops at our school. She teaches some ways to help kids read the text books. I use her stuff and it works. I had her come see me teach it to my seniors. Not every body will come back and do that. She's pretty helpful.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Wouldn't it have been helpful if the superintendent had evaluated the literacy program (not just the people but the whole model) before suggesting cuts to it?

    ReplyDelete
  36. Sorry, the superintendent doesn't evaluate programs or principals. She keeps herself very clear of the dirty work.

    ReplyDelete
  37. STATES CURB DOUBLE DIPPING
    http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2011/07/13/36doubledip_ep.h30.html?tkn=ZPRFLot13%2F9NlxQieIx7B8MP9%2FrkfpKn1mIw&cmp=ENL-EU-NEWS1

    This post is not intended to be teacher or superintendent bashing. There are excellent teachers out there. This is an all-in-one to political candidates (particularly those in charge of political appointments and/or hiring for very crucial positions as there are too many immature, selfish people being appointed) to stop the double-dipping in all areas. Most retirees who were professionals during their careers should be drawing from their retirement plans. Give non-retirees a shot. Grow the economy!

    With all this back and forth about education, how on earth are we to implement anything with no money to fund the bright ideas?

    ReplyDelete
  38. "THE AMERICAN TEACHER" (A Film)
    http://fest11.sffs.org/films/film_details.php

    Again, my post above was honestly not intended to bash. We just need to get a handle on things maturely. It would be interesting to compare and contrast the films "Race to Nowhere" and "The American Teacher" "The American Teacher" makes the claim that American teachers are grossly underpaid. This is not the case in Norwalk. Is it?

    ReplyDelete
  39. First of all, the Cali model has several components. It is basically all about common sense. To simplify, Cali makes use of data to drive instruction, encourages a working team among colleagues so no teacher works in isolation, and focuses on the importance of professional consensus and positive climate in school environments. I would say that Norwalk has been stuck in the data component while dabbling in the team appproach. Building climate is a very serious matter that involves followup and solution to the surveys filled out by staff and parents. That certainly was an excellent start. This is precisely where principals need to take it on the chin, so to speak, and promote those excellent working conditions staff requires to be the very best they can be. Those in the private sector know now to treat their employees to gain from the most productivity. Listen and learn. Let's continue where we left off with the climate surveys to make NPS the best possible. Can we be sure there were enough participants who filled them out to acquire a range of data? Have the students been surveyed? Not a bad thing to do; they can tell you honestly about specific issues a school should be aware of (bullying, safety, level of comfort, etc.). We still have have quite a bit of work to do.

    ReplyDelete

ShareThis