A version of this story appears on TheDailyNorwalk.com
Two days after passing a budget with more than $4 million in cuts, Norwalk school board members and school officials had a range of reactions — from "devastated" to "less harmful" — about the end result.
The school board worked late into the night Tuesday, debating and voting on the cuts that brought its budget down to $155 million. By the end, 33 positions were eliminated and several nonpersonnel expenditures were reduced. Cuts include 10 teachers, two high school housemasters, West Rocks’ assistant principal, central office administrators and security positions at the high schools. (Click here for the full list.)
“I hated doing it,” board Chairman Jack Chiaramonte said of the cuts. “We tried to keep the cuts away from the kids directly.” The board decided not to cut first grade aides, intervention aides, library aides, or the third grade strings program.
The board’s four Democrats voted against the budget. Jodi Bishop-Pullan, who has been on the board for 12 years, said, “This was the worst budget I’ve gone through. I’m devastated by how much was cut. It just wasn’t enough money. You can blame the city or you can blame the unions. In either case, I just can’t condone this budget.”
Bishop-Pullan is especially worried about the high schools. “I’m concerned about the student-to-teacher-to-administrator ratio if we lose the housemasters,” she says. “A lot of the problems that happen in urban high schools can be avoided with the right staffing.”
Chiaramonte said the cuts will take a toll on Central Office. Three top administrator positions were cut: the director of elementary education, instructional specialist for grants and instructional specialist for social studies/grants. “Jobs at Central Office will be more stressful. People will have to do the jobs of two or three people,” he said.
Superintendent Susan Marks said she is also concerned about the “very, very thin” Central Office. “Successful school system need resources in the schools, and they also need resources to support the schools and be responsive to teachers and parents." She said cuts in Central Office affect curriculum development, professional development and administrator evaluations. Nonetheless, she said, "We don't have a choice. There are things that have to get done."
With 10 teachers cut, Marks says she will be paying close attention to class sizes next year.
Steve Colarossi, chairman of the board’s finance committee, said most cuts have some affect on student achievement, however, he said the board was successful in minimizing the impact of the cuts. “I think these were less harmful types of cuts.” He said he sought to minimize the number of people who would lose their jobs by reducing positions of people who were retiring or leaving the district.
Mayor Richard Moccia was at Tuesday’s meeting until the end. He broke two significant ties voting in favor of two elementary assistant principals and against two high school housemasters.
Like Colarossi, Moccia is a satisfied with the results. “This detailed review by Dr Marks' administration and the Board of Ed members resulted in a collaboration that avoided the dire the predictions that some had made about the future of our system,” he said.
Midway through the meeting, when he heard that the board had $2.1 million remaining to cut, Chiaramonte had an outburst about the lack of union concessions. “I thought to myself: That was the amount we would have had if the teachers took a pay freeze," he said of the moment. “They could have saved their co-workers jobs.”
The teacher’s union retirement play yielded $130,000 in savings instead of the anticipated $350,000 from an early retirement incentive package eventually offered by the teachers' unions.
Colarossi also took issue with some of the superintendent’s proposed cuts, especially the elementary school-based ones, and advocated for preserving first grade and intervention aides. “Every study I’ve read says the best way to reduce the achievement gap is to promote early childhood learning.”
Moving forward, Marks plans to work with the board on strategic planning. “Our budget decisions must relate to the needs of the school system,” she said. “They should also be tied to accountability, good teaching and consistency from school to school."
Chiaramonte is hopeful the district will be able to restore both housemaster and the West Rocks' assistant principal positions. Marks said the district is negotiating health insurance contracts that will produce savings. At Tuesday’s meeting, the mayor also suggested non-personnel items for possible savings. “We should know about these positions pretty soon,” said Chiaramonte.
Friday, June 17, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
If additional funds are found, restore positions to the classrooms and to the schools. It's a no brainer.
ReplyDeleteLet's be honest about Chiarmonte's 'outburst.' He brought up the scheckel comment once again. He appeared to be accusing Bruce Melion of using the sheckel comment in the past to detract from the budget problems. However or whatever it meant, bringing it up again in an accusatory way was totally inappropriate. Or is that accepted in New York too?
ReplyDeleteNew York Jack...or better yet, once a New Yorker, always a New Yorker. Let's not forget, he's battling with another of New York's finest, Bruce Mellion. Where does anyone think that Norwalk, CT fits into all this mess?? It doesn't...............
ReplyDeleteI applaude Colorassi for listening to parents and for keeping as many cuts out of the classroom as he/his committee could. I also applaude Haynie. She knows that many teachers need to go. I don't think she is so much anti-teacher as she is anti-bad teachers. Colorassi and Haynie are two different people who come at things from different perspectives, but both of those perspectives are needed. They provide checks and balances even of each other and I hope at the end of the day, they respect each other and understand that both want what is best for students.
ReplyDeleteWhat I am more concerned about is immature and racially prejudice teachers and admin. I am concerned that there is so much politics in education that parents can't even trust the grades their children receive. I am very concerned that top grade earners are having to take remedial courses in college. I am concerned about the lack of an integrated curriculum. I am concerned about patronizing attitudes toward minority students and the low expectations of many of our students. If we as adults cannot get it together, how will the students fair? All this glam and media courting and thinks merely looking good on paper, but not executed in ways where we see solid and consistent results. JUST GET DOWN TO THE BASICS OF EDUCATING STUDENTS. Why is that so hard to do these days? And can someone please tell me what is going on with our magnet school? Is it doing the job it was intended to do? Is it thriving academically for all of its students. We know they have the Young Astronauts that gets annual media attention and the multiculture fairs, but are all of the cultures thriving in that school?
I like the fact that Haynie and Marks are visiting the schools. Principals need to be held accountable for the morale of their staff and for their administraive ability or inability to lead their teachers in teaching well. This is not a social club education. Teaching is a science. I think we need to hold Dr. Marks accountable, but we don't need to crucify her. It's too soon. She just got here and she got here just in time for a local election, union-BOE fights and budget cuts. That has to be very interesting. Instead of posturing and fighting each other for personal reasons, can we move away from each other's personal history or baggage. Instead, CAN WE GET AN INTEGRATED CURRICULUM? I think that would help students place their "academics" in their long-term memory and I think it would certainly help with the test scores. INTEGRATED CURRICULUM, please!
PLEASE, please, if additional funds are found, restore the 4 housemasters and 4 house secretaries in each high school. I KNOW FOR A FACT that it will be devastating with only 3 and 3.
ReplyDeleteAre you all looking at what's best for the adults or for the children? What has been gained with what is currently in place? Mediocrity, maybe? When people work for our city they should envelope all of our diversity and not be allowed to pretend to. They should know that they cannot come to our system and flim-flam it, making more money than they could make in neighboring areas, and do mediocre work as they earn these big salaries. REAL PREPARATION has to start in the elementary schools in order to prepare students for middle and high school. There are so many problems at the middle school and high school areas because children were not properly trained in elementary schools. Some elementary schools do a good job, others do not and one looks good in writing and theory, but not in practice. These things need to be addressed. Let go of the politics of keeping dead weight because we are afraid of people suing. I'd rather pay the money to get rid of bad teachers than pay them to stay. The good teachers deserve to have the teaching profession respected. It is the bad and uncaring teachers who are destroying the profession. We can't make anyone care, but we can show them the door when they prove they don't.
ReplyDeleteCan we please discuss how we plan to create and implement a better curriculum for the STUDENTS? Moina, have you thought about sitting with Dr. Marks and the curriculum specialist to see what improvements need to be made and when they will be made. POLITICS SHOULD NOT HINDER PROGRESS. It should promote progress.
Piqued Livid!
http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/collective_impact
ReplyDeletehttp://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/07/the-world-8217-s-schoolmaster/8532/
In case you missed this link from Norwalk RedApples, great information
ReplyDeletehttp://redapplesnorwalk.org/?page_id=6
Long and short of the "great information" from the Susan Marks Fan Club (a/k/a Red Apples):
ReplyDelete1. Susan Marks has no vision-- there's not be a single edcuation reform she's planned or implemented.
2. The Supt. just expected union concessions-- she didn't try to do anything to motivate them (she should have learned from the Mayor who was masterful in working with City uinons).
3. The Supt. sent out surveys--- wow--- she hasn't shown a willingness to listen to opposing view points, so it's nothing more than a feel good exercise.
4. The Supt. formed a Budget Committee-- but, they didn't take any votes and there are no minutes of their meeitngs. Supt. Marks' still recommended cutting 15 TEACHERS and didn't have a plan for how anything would be staffed.
5. She had this BUDGET COMMITTEE BUT STILL MADE HER OWN DECISIONS TO DESTROY THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS.
6. The fact that Susan Marks didn't renominate Ruotolo or Cook isnt an example of her leadership--- do you forget how many meetings there were when Colarossi or Rivas refused to take their nonsense answers. If we are going to thank anyone for getting rid of that dead wood, thank them--- and, Ruotolo and Cook were not competent so there was no way they should have been renewed anyway.
\
10:09 is absolutely right.
ReplyDelete10:09 the colarossi and mellion fan club has spoken
ReplyDeleteWell, Susan Marks club, have you read in the comments of the post (below this one) that Susan Marks has asked to have the Director Of Elem. Educ. position restored with the insurance money? What say you to that? She really cares about classrooms? Don't make me laugh.
ReplyDeleteWe don't yet know if it is fact that Marks asked to restore the Director of Elementary Ed. position.
ReplyDeleteWhat each of us can do is put together a list of positions we'd like to see restored and in the order we'd like to see them restored (and perhaps a short reason why). This should give the board and Dr. Marks something concrete to consider.
Piqued Livid!
I haven't received any request to restore the Director of Elementary Education. However, as nothing has changed with that post's lack of accomplishments since last Tuesday, I would oppose restoring that position. As I said publicly, the last three people who held that position possessed an amazing aray of skills and experiences, and they couldn't make the position work. Clearly, we need to focus on a reorganization of Central Office that should include the means by which we will better evaluate school administrators.
ReplyDeleteWith respect to the insurance savings money, I do believe that each high school could use 4 housemasters-- although I belive that some of them in each building must be 10-month positions.
I also think that we need to examine what special needs West Rocks might have, given its size.
Finally, I am very concerned about the extra five teaching positions that were cut-- at no point in the budget process did we ever see a list of what schools would be impacted. My review of the data from our budget book (which I acknowledge is not perfect) suggests that it might be the Title I schools that would suffer the greatest loss of positions. However, if we examine the data that suggest that Title I schools should have the smallest class sizes, then we would want to closely evaluate how these cuts in teaching positions would affect our most at-risk students. Staffing schools isn't about taking a citywide average of students and teachers-- rather, it mandates that a careful school-by-school, grade-by-grade evaluation be conducted.
Yes Steve, you are right about the careful analysis needed for the class size issue. Title 1 schools certainly should have smaller classes which will benefit the at risk students. Cutting 5 teachers does not take this important issue into account.Who will monitor this situation as it unfolds this summer? Some schools have large numbers already and many students register over the summer changing those numbers daily.
ReplyDeleteI am glad you realize that this is important and I hope that you will
help address this situation.
Those of us in Title I schools face different challenges. We are optimistic that perhaps finally, someone is taking that into consideration.
ReplyDeletePlease watch carefully and don't let the Title I funds, which by law are supposed to follow poor students, be siphoned off to support central office and other district-wide positions. This has been going on for a couple of years. How on earth can we justify paying instructional specialists with this money? They aren't in the schools working with teachers or students.
3:06, if what you say is true, it is highly illegal to use federal funds to pay instructional specialists with these funds. If the State Department of Education discovers that this money is being used illegally, you can bet Norwalk will be in enormous trouble.
ReplyDelete