Pages

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Marks Emphasizes Evaluations

A version of this story appears in TheDailyNorwalk.com

The firing of a tenured middle school teacher has prompted the new Superintendent of Norwalk Public Schools to send a memo to principals about the importance of written evaluations.  “A principal’s most important job is to pay attention to what people in their building are doing,” says Susan Marks in an interview explaining the need for her memo. “Everyone deserves truthful and respectful feedback.”

Marks’ memo comes on the heels of the firing of Oscar Williams, a teacher at Ponus Ridge Middle School. Williams was terminated by the BOE for abusive conduct towards students and for his refusal to follow his supervisor’s instructions. An impartial arbitration panel recommended against firing Williams because he had no prior negative evaluations, written warnings, or disciplinary actions in his file. The BOE overruled the panel’s finding.

Marks says she supports the BOE’s decision.  “The panel accepted all the facts of the case and the facts speak for themselves,” she says.  The panel found, among other things, that Williams repeatedly used crude language when speaking to students.

Marks says she has been discussing the importance of evaluations with principals since she started her position in July.  “I’m asking them, what’s your plan for evaluation? What kind of support do you give your staff, especially the underperforming ones? I’m telling them that those who don’t improve need to be monitored.”

Although there is a standard evaluation procedure for teachers, a lack of personnel and computer systems have prevented centralizing the process, says Marks.   “There are only three employees in the HR department for this entire district because of budget cuts,” she adds, naming the Director Fay Ruotolo and two other employees.  “There is no automated system to keep track of the evaluations coming in.”
Marks says she will try through the budget process to get more support for Human Resources or she may have to reorganize existing staff and resources.

Evaluations are not only for teachers.  According to Marks, they're needed for everyone in a school building, including secretaries, assistant principals, and custodians. Principals, she says, need to be evaluated by Tony Daddona, Assistant Superintendent of Curriculum and Instruction and Carol Marinaccio, Director of Elementary Education.   Marks also says the district needs more training on how to conduct evaluations.  Working on this with the unions, Ruotolo, Daddona and Marinaccio, she says, is also part of her plan.

14 comments:

  1. Whew!
    I thought that the problem with principals not doing evaluations was that we had some notoriously incompetent principals and a totally inept Human Resources Director.
    Thank goodness Dr. Marks is here to explain that the problem is just about too few staff and no computer software.

    The third floor lives to blight yet another day in our children's educations.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The problem is that even the principals need effective supervision and meaningful evaluation, but I doubt that they are given either. The HR director doesn't evaluate administrators because that isn't part of the responsibilities of that job. However, the AS and the director of elementary do have that responsibility. Further, the AS evaluates the director of elementary.

    ReplyDelete
  3. But, don't we have to recognize that the H R Director needs to develop the system to be sure that teachers are being evaluated?
    Isn't she supposed to let that Third Floor Cabinet know when principals aren't evaluating staff?
    As long as her friends on the BOE protect her and as long as the new superintendent doesn't hold her accountable, the system can't change.
    We make teachers teach even without state of the art equipment. We insist that teachers doe their jobs even if parents don't participate like we want them to.
    Why is Supt. Marks holding Fay Ruotolo to a totally different standard?

    ReplyDelete
  4. The real truth is that principals and central office staff had no support from the former superintendent if they wrote bad evaluations. Let's see if Marks continues to support the administrators once union pressure is applied. This should be very interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  5. 10:49 - Since Dr. Marks has been on the job for not even three months, I don't see how she is responsible. As for the Ponus problem, the process of firing a teacher takes longer than 3 months. This process began before Marks had a contract, so if the media reports are accurate, someone else dropped the ball.

    I do agree that it is for Marks to hold central office administrators and principals responsible for properly evaluating all staff. Anyone who failed to do so last school year should now be held accountable.

    That said, anyone from central office or any principal who protected ineffective and or just plain bad teachers or administrators should also be held accountable. These central office administrators and these principals have been around since before Dr. Marks -- years before Marks.

    To those who would say that Sal Corda wouldn't allow them to take action against these principals, remember that he has been gone for well over a year, which is plenty of time to evaluate and take action against anyone.

    ReplyDelete
  6. 3:24--Sal Corda spent the better part of NINE years: 1)not going into schools 2)being evasive with teachers 3) by way of evaluation simply asking principals, "How's everything going at____(fill in school)" and 4)golfing when he felt like it. What would make anyone think that in his absence of ONE year that the network of UNACCOUNTABILITY could be erased? Susan Marks has NOW officially begun her tenure in Norwalk, and one has to believe that she was not let in on any of these surprises. She has a very short learning curve here. Let's hope she's up to the challenge.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yes, time has passed since Corda's non-support, but what makes you think a temporary superintendent would back an administrator in trouble with the union because he/she wrote a bad evaluation? Wake up to reality! Administrators need the unwavering support of the superintendent AND the BOE. Time will tell if these two crucial support systems will be in place with this super and this board...

    ReplyDelete
  8. 5:51 - I don't buy it, and I say that because I know the people involved. The taxpayers cannot accept weak excuses. Professional educators who have integrity and fortitude do what is right. I don't want to hear the excuse that administrators might be in trouble with the union. The union can raise a fuss but it's difficult for them to win if the administrator has done his job professionally.

    Administrators should work as hard at getting rid of inferior teachers, principals and assistant principals as they do at securing generous salary and benefits increases for themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  9. If the teacher's union is so big and bad, how many grievances have they filed the past ten years? Hmm . . .
    Other than suing the BOE over the secret sweetheart deal Jody Bishop Pullan gave to Sal Corda in 2007 and hid from the public, when was the last time the union got up in the school district's face?
    7:11 is right-- this is about lazy, incompetent administrators and a new superintendent who hasn't proven that she'll stand up to them.

    ReplyDelete
  10. In response to the 7:46am and 7:11 poster, I'm not sure I would use the term lazy...Many administrators I know sure seemed to work hard to deny my child access to special education services. In fact, they worked at if for years. Rather than being lazy, I can assure you that I feel they worked extremely hard! As for evaluations, my suspicion is that they received a glowing eval for a job well done in denying another child much-needed services.

    ReplyDelete
  11. 10:44- you've made a poignant observation.
    From my own ordeals with Janie Friedlander, I don't know who was worse-- her, or the lawyers they had fighting me.
    Back then, I never got how no one was monitoring all the due process hearings so many of us had to push. Now, we see that it wasn't just special ed that wasn't being monitored, but quite a few principals as well.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Following on your point, 12:11pm, in many cases, it seems as if the amount of money being spent on lawyers fees on the part of the district is much, much larger than the actual cost of the program for the child. If only they'd channel that energy and money into appropriate programs, everyone would be better off -- in the short run and the long run.

    ReplyDelete
  13. What is the mechanism to remove the plethora of highly-paid do-nothing administrators in the central orifice?

    ReplyDelete
  14. 1:39 PM- to get rid of the do-nothings, I'd say elect more people like Haynie, Halsey and Colarossi. They've been the only ones to stand up to central administration.

    ReplyDelete

ShareThis