Pages

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

Early Teacher Retirements Offer Modest Savings

Every little bit helps. That seems to be the consensus of school and union officials about a financial agreement reached between the district and the teachers' union to cut costs. The Norwalk Board of Education voted unanimously last Thursday in favor of an early retirement plan for teachers that could save the district nearly $350,000 next year.

On Tuesday afternoon, 100 teachers met with Bruce Mellion, president of the Norwalk Federation of Teachers, at West Rocks Middle School Library and also voted unanimously on the deal. “Every dollar is helpful to this budget," says Mellion.

Craig Drezek, chief operating officer of the Norwalk schools, says early retirement incentive plans are common in dealing with budget shortfalls. “It doesn’t cure the budget gap, but at this point every little bit helps,” says Drezek.

By June, the Norwalk Board of Education has to cut $4.6 million to bring the budget down to $154.8 million — the amount that the city allotted to the Board of Education in early May.

“It’s something, but it's surely not enough to prevent layoffs and major cuts,” says Board of Education Chair Jack Chiaramonte. “The unions did not save the day, like they could have.” Chiaramonte has been asking the teachers union for a wage freeze, which would have saved the district nearly $2 million.

The savings from the agreement result from the difference between the salary and benefits of a senior teacher versus that of hiring a new teacher with less experience — about $100,000 versus $50,000. In addition, the district would not have to pay unemployment to these teachers, unlike teachers who are laid off. The district, which self funds its unemployment payments, must pay $29,000 to each laid-off teacher.

As part of the deal, Norwalk teachers will be offered an incentive of $15,000 to retire early. The incentive payment will be deferred until 2012 and paid over two years.

The $350,000 in savings is predicated on 10 teachers accepting the package. “Teachers will have to see where they are on their journey and look at their economic situation,” says Mellion. The deadline for teachers take the incentive package is June 10. After that, the district will know how much was saved as a result of this agreement.

So far this year, Mellion says 14 teachers are expected to retire. He expects the incentive plan will raise that number. Although Superintendent Susan Marks has proposed cutting 15 teacher positions, Mellion believes retirements, attrition and resignations will cover that number. "At the end, no teacher will lose a job," says Mellion.

The school board also accepted an offer by the custodians’ union to freeze their salaries for next year. The current contract, which was up for renegotiation, will be extended another year. Drezek estimates the custodians concessions will save the district $100,000.

The school board is also negotiating with the Norwalk Association of School Administrators, which represents principals and other administrators, but no terms have been agreed upon yet.

41 comments:

  1. I read the following statement into the Minutes of the May 19, 2011 Board of Education meeting where this NFT proposal was approved.

    "My argument against the NFT Proposal is that Connecticut Boards of Education and State of Connecticut Superintendents cannot make staff reduction decisions based upon employee performance and district needs. Employment decisions in Connecticut are ruled by seniority, aka, LIFO (last in/first out). If the NFT proposal had come to the Board of Education AFTER staff reductions had been made that were based on merit or lack thereof, that would be a different story. I have no objection to early retirement incentives/bonuses that can help budget scenarios and that reward excellence. However, for this NFT proposal, the Who, What, Where and Why of the retirements, because of LIFO, are decisions that the Union alone will make. Student needs and the district needs are irrelevant. It’s not the way a well-run enterprise does business. LIFO has overstayed its usefulness in education. The Unions love it but it’s an adult-focused perk in a child-focused business. Not good for kids, it has become an impediment to student and district improvement. However, the Board of Education’s hands are tied; we need the budgetary flexibility this proposal allows so I will vote for it."

    Please also read the following article written by the Executive Directors of the Connecticut Association of Boards of Education (CABE) and the Connecticut Association of Public School Superintendents (CAPSS) regarding LIFO

    http://articles.courant.com/2011-05-14/news/hc-op-rader-cirasuolo-teacher-layoffs20110514_1_teachers-with-less-experience-boards-and-superintendents-school-districts/2

    As clarification, the Additional severance payment per retiree is $17,868 (not $15,000) which is an added $178,680 cost.

    The savings in 2011/12 could be somewhere around $350,000 but the Net savings is only around $171,000 (because the added $178,680 in severance is payable in 2012/13 and 2013/14).

    ReplyDelete
  2. How do you suggest useing merit as a way to dtermine who keeps theri job? There are so many factors that affect student learning, how can you hold a teacher soley accountable? Students come in to school being abused, being neglected, in need of medical care, in need of food and clothing, the list goes on. It is very hard to blame the classroom teacher for the lack of progress of some students...this is a very tricky area and not one to be taken lightly or as an easy idea to implement.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Exactly, 10:24 AM. I wish people who are not or never were educators understood this more. Teachers are responsible for what goes on in the classroom. No one is trying to shirk that responsibility. It's just that so much happens in the homes and in the streets. So sad.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The net savings of $171,000 would pay for nearly 1/2 of our intervention aides that had been slated for total elimination in Supt. Marks' budget "plan".
    Wow- that seems like a great opportunity for the BOE to save real money.
    Cannot figure out why any BOE member would be against this kind of savings?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Because it's all about politics and power.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Memo to Sue Haynie-- if you want to perseverate about national teaching laws, please do so on your own time. We elected you to do something about Norwalk's schools.
    How dare you vote against a plan to save us money (that could be used to save Middle School AT-- that Supt. Marks plans on cutting) just to make a political point. Shameful.

    ReplyDelete
  7. So Sue Haynie votes against a plan to save real dollars just to make a political point.
    She wants a state law change to give the superintendent more power.
    She's publicly supported building up the central office at the expense of the schools.
    Who'd have thunk it-- that she would be the one to become a superintendent-supporting-politician? What happens to folks once they're elected to the BOE?

    ReplyDelete
  8. To the 2 posters above, you are mistaken. I did vote in favor of the NFT proposal. Please re-read the post.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Please help me understand if Ms. Haynie voted in favor of the early retirement proposal, why did she spend so much time writing that she was against it?
    I've heard of being against something after someone was for it, but never at the SAME TIME.
    Didn't she write that "Student needs and the district needs are irrelevant" in describing the plan?
    Doesn't that seem like something someone would vote against, if that's the way they really felt?
    Just saying . . . .

    ReplyDelete
  10. Sue, I hope you won't be voting to support central office needs vs. school needs when the budget vote comes up again. Blindly supporting the superintendent is not in the schools best interest. This is a new superintendent. She might be good, but she needs more time here before she knows what's in the best interest of NPS. You know better. Please think for yourself.

    ReplyDelete
  11. To the Previous Posters...

    I believe this was point Sue was trying to make when she wrote:

    "However, for this NFT proposal, the Who, What, Where and Why of the retirements, because of LIFO, are decisions that the Union alone will make. Student needs and the district needs are irrelevant. It’s not the way a well-run enterprise does business. LIFO has overstayed its usefulness in education. The Unions love it but it’s an adult-focused perk in a child-focused business. Not good for kids, it has become an impediment to student and district improvement."
    ___________

    Here's the bottom line Norwalk residents and NPS staff: due to the 19th Century structure and labor work rules that pervade US education these days, it means that in Norwalk's case, rightly or wrongly Bruce Mellion and Tony Ditrio yeild more control over what happens to your classroom and children than Susan Marks.

    That fact coupled with a BOE structure that is reluctant take on the status quo and/or are instructed by the GOP or Dem party hacks to oppose anything the other party is for or against means gridlock.

    If there is poor morale in NPS...look to your union leadership as they control your destiny. A for parents, residents and future voters, seek out candidates next fall who are intelligent, can think independently and have common sense.

    C'mon Norwalk ...isn't that what we are trying to teach our children?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Sue, you never answered how you would handle eliminating teachers if seniority wasn't a concern. Would you use teacher evaluations? If so, then something needs to be done to be sure Pricipals are using the procedure correctly and many of us know that some are not. Would you use student achievement? How would you allow for all the other influences on students outside of the school/classroom? You make and Lisa Thompson make it sound as if it would be easy to change the current procedure but if you really thought it out you would see that it isn't that simple. Teachers do need protection from umreasonable parents and Principals. I am not saying there are teachers who aren't in need of improvement, but I know there are cases that are being dealt with on an individual basis and I know teachers have"not been asked back" after their frst year. If the teacher education programs and the state TEAM program are working properly, there shouldn'e be teachers in the classroom who don't belong there, maybe need a little more support, but not someone who shouldn't be there are all. Maybe you should look at teacher prepartation programs and the TEAM program first.

    ReplyDelete
  13. 11.34

    I hear what you are saying about teacher evaluations...but guess what, the principals use the SAME excuse against the Director of Elementary position, whose job I understand is to evaluate principals. With everyone in education afraid or unwilling to have themselves evaluated in this country state and city..no wonder our test scores and academic rigor is falling behind the rest of the world.

    There are US laws against discrimination or unfair dismissal in the real world. Why does education have to be special?

    I am a very frustrated parent.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Lisa,
    If we go back to when the superintendent evaluated elementary principals, we would have a system that works much better. We can't ask for perfection, but principals would respect an evaluation from the superintendent and be less likely to question it. Just watch how quickly the principals fall back into line if they are evaluated this way. Teachers will also feel the pressure from above. Ralph Sloan did it. Susan Marks should at least do it for a few years.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Lisa,where do you get your information? The director of Elem Ed. does very little to eval. the Principals, I can't imagine what they complain about. They meet with the director privately, in 24 years as a teacher, I have never seen any director or superint. observe the Principal in action...how about coming to a faculty meeting, how about input from teachers and parents..exactly what do they use to evaluate? Teachers write lesson plans to submit, teachers are observed in the classroom a few times during the year as well as "drop ins" the principals are not observed. I also have children in the district and have had very serious concerns about a Principal that was swept under the carpet by the director of El. Ed. there were a group of parents with specific concerns about the was a specific incident was handled and nothing happened. This same principal has had several similar complaints over the years and still no one comes to see first hand what is going on. What could principals possibly be complaining about?

    ReplyDelete
  16. 3:13--"Susan Marks should at least do it for a few years"....A few years is a stretch with a recent retiree from another system. It's not happening. Ralph Sloan was in his early 40's when he came to Norwalk. See: Joshua Starr taking over in Montgomery County, MD. Do you think Susan applied?

    And 5:24--"What could principals possibly be complaining about?" You're kidding, right?

    ReplyDelete
  17. I'm curious to know thoughts about Joe Klein's article in "The Atlantic."

    http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/06/the-failure-of-american-schools/8497/

    If the link is not active, cut and paste into your browser.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I don't think they have anything to complain about as far as their evaluations go...there are plenty of things to complain about but not that!

    ReplyDelete
  19. I checked out the link. The Joe Klein article in the Atlantic mentioned above is a worthy read.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Someone has got to be able to help me understand this thread.
    There is a post about a savings due to teacher retirement incentive. They're not gonna save us millions, but any savings sounds good. Right?
    One school board member blasts the proposals and claims that the teachers unions will control who retires (but doesn't say how-- mind control? teachers like Boris and Natsha following Fearless Leader? I don't know). But she still freakin' votes for the plan, but she still freakin' talks about tenure and unions and stuff that we don't have any control over.
    I don't have any kids in the system, so I shouldn't be too peeved. But, this woman has control over more than half of the taxes I pay. When does she focus on what's going on and what she actually has the authority to change?

    ReplyDelete
  21. I think the point of this post might just be that people like you mr. poster above should be questioning your governor, legislators and state senators as to why boards and districts are faced with your quesetion 'tenure and unions and stuff that we don't have any control over'.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Eliminate the Vice Principals in the elementary schools and MAKE the Principals do their jobs!

    ReplyDelete
  23. Dear Michigan Governor Snyder,

    In these tough economic times, schools are hurting. And yes, everyone in Michigan is hurting right now financially, but why aren’t we protecting schools? Schools are the one place on Earth that people look to to “fix” what is wrong with society by educating our youth and preparing them to take on the issues that society has created.

    One solution I believe we must do is take a look at our corrections system in Michigan. We rank nationally at the top in the number of people we incarcerate. We also spend the most money per prisoner annually than any other state in the union. Now, I like to be at the top of lists, but this is one ranking that I don’t believe Michigan wants to be on top of.

    Consider the life of a Michigan prisoner. They get three square meals a day. Access to free health care. Internet. Cable television. Access to a library. A weight room. Computer lab. They can earn a degree. A roof over their heads. Clothing. Everything we just listed we DO NOT provide to our school children.

    This is why I’m proposing to make my school a prison. The State of Michigan spends annually somewhere between $30,000 and $40,000 per prisoner, yet we are struggling to provide schools with $7,000 per student. I guess we need to treat our students like they are prisoners, with equal funding. Please give my students three meals a day. Please give my children access to free health care. Please provide my school district Internet access and computers. Please put books in my library. Please give my students a weight room so we can be big and strong. We provide all of these things to prisoners because they have constitutional rights. What about the rights of youth, our future?!

    Please provide for my students in my school district the same way we provide for a prisoner. It’s the least we can do to prepare our students for the future...by giving our schools the resources necessary to keep our students OUT of prison.

    Respectfully submitted,

    Nathan Bootz
    Superintendent
    Ithaca Public Schools
    May,12,2011

    ReplyDelete
  24. 3.26 am - sorry, wrong blog!

    ReplyDelete
  25. Might be the wrong blog 3:26, but you made an excellent point for this blog as well!

    ReplyDelete
  26. It’s nice to see the civil dialog and concern expressed in this blog post. And the reference Superintendent Bootz of Ithaca, NY makes to the prison system and education is apt. To quote Bob Chase, the former President of the National Education Association, “So strong is the link between literacy and being a useful member of society that some states use 3rd grade-level reading statistics as a factor in projecting future prison construction.”
    The 2010 CMT scores show that out of 39,005 Connecticut 3rd graders, 16,733 were reading below grade level. In Norwalk, out of 747 3rd graders, 361 kids were reading below grade level. Broken out by ethnicity—Asian American, 12 kids; Black, 108 kids; Hispanic, 144 kids; White, 97 kids, which brings us back to the gist of this post---student needs must come first. (Source www.cmtreports.com)

    'Double Jeopardy: How Poverty & 3rd Grade Reading Skills Influence High School Graduation’-April 2011 Report by the Annie E. Casey Foundation
    'All Children Can Read by 4th Grade'-March 2007 Report by Connecticut Commission on Children

    ReplyDelete
  27. I'm sure some people will find it quite impressive, Mrs. Haynie, that you had knowledge to cite Bob Chase's statement regarding the number of prisons needed and the percentage of non proficient 3rd grade readers. Unfortunately, this idea has been challenged, even by the very liberal New York Times, which found it irresponsible when a politician (Bob Chase was not the originator but he just parrotted it) first uttered it to manipulate voters while stumping for public office. Since then, the idea has gained popularity in the media because it is such a provocative statement. I offer this input because I am sure that you aspire to be more than a provocateur in your very public role with the BOE, Mrs. Haynie. In rhetoric, this statement is an example of a "logical fallacy." It is is one of the tricks of the trade of debate. The faulty correlation between percentage of non proficent 3rd grade readers and number of prisons that we need to build has no greater link than the fact that the greatest percentage of houses in my neighborhood are 3 bedroom capes and the fact that we only have had 1 skunk spraying incident this year. No need to fret though because you are in good company when you espouse the statement you cited above. Because it is so provocative, it persists in being bandied about by many reading program publishers and literacy tutoring service providers who are trying to hawk their wares to beleaguered school districts (like Norwalk) in this tightly strapped economy. Their tactics are no different than snake oil salesmen of the 1800's who made outrageous claims to the local yokels huddled around the back of their wagons for the medicine show, believing in a product for a cure all. Once in a while it would be refreshing if we would consult with the Literacy Specialists and teachers for our information about improving literacy in this district, not just the very vocal yet well-intentioned layperson like yourself. Just saying. . .

    ReplyDelete
  28. I just want to thank everyone for the level of discourse and politeness displayed in the last few posts. I've enjoyed linking to articles cited, and I've learned a great deal. Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  29. Dear Poster 7:54--A fabulous site devoted to literacy and reading and very much worth the visit is: www.childrenofthecode.org

    This link below is from Children of the Code and deals with juvenile justice--

    http://www.childrenofthecode.org/library/refs/juvjusticespecialedread.htm#Juvenile_Justice,_Special_Education_and_Reading_Difficulty:_

    ReplyDelete
  30. Sue - thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  31. Can we be updated on what's happening with the BOE cuts?

    ReplyDelete
  32. Next BOE meeting is on June 7th. I'll have an update about cuts after that. Apologies for the lack of posts this week. Have been busy writing stories for TheDailyNorwalk.com and with family commitments.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Moina,

    Do you recommend attending that meeting? Would a big turnout be helpful?

    ReplyDelete
  34. 70% OF REAL ESTATE TAXES GO TO "EDUCATION" OF WHICH 40% GOES TO CENTRAL ORIFICE...disgusting.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Then make sure central office positions are the ones that are cut! Leave the classrooms alone!

    ReplyDelete
  36. Can anyone help me understand this?
    The supt. wants to keep her Director of Elementary Ed but wants to INCREASE elementary class sizes, cut elementary school librarians, reduce first grade aides, cut out all elementary school intervention aides and remove a few assitant principals. Huh?
    Seems like more of the same-- wondering when she threatens to close the pool . . .

    ReplyDelete
  37. For some reason, I can't log-in (so this post will appear as being from anonymous), but wanted to share with those of you following this thread a link to a list of cuts that had been proposed by Supt. Marks and the Finance Committee's response to those proposals.
    In short, the Finance Committee found consensus in recommending to the entire BOE nearly $2.5 Million in cuts. These are not ideal-- and we strongly encourage our colleagues to closely review each and every suggestion we are making. None of us enjoy the prospect of reducing anyone's job, nor do we find the need to make very hard choices terribly appealing. However, we take very seriously the obligation we owe to Norwalk's taxpayers, students and families and recognize the duty we have to make the best possible decisions in very dire economic times.
    As a committee, we wanted to share our agreement with some of the Superintendent's cuts, and offer some alternatives that we felt would have less of an impact on classroom learning.
    You can find the link to the document here:
    http://portal.norwalkps.org/npsdepartments/finance/Documents/RECOMMENDED%2011-12%20BUDGET%20REDUCTIONS.pdf
    My own perspective is that we must preserve classroom programs, even if it means causing some adminsitrative hardship at the central office level. Not an ideal choice- but a choice that will need to be made.
    As we enter into the final month of budget deliberations, we decided that we would ask the COO to develop a same-services budget for next year. The cost for that budget would be a little over $159 Million. We need to add $82,667 to that same-services budget to cover our projected shortfall for this year. The City's taxpayers are giving us $154,801,489. This means that we must find $4,634,419 in cuts.
    I have been trying to respond to every email I've received. Please feel free to contact me at colarossis@norwalkps.org

    Sincerely,
    Steve Colarossi
    Finance Committee Chairman

    ReplyDelete
  38. Steve you made two posts right after another 3:12 & 3:30. Did you mean to do that

    ReplyDelete
  39. What about the City of Norwalk? There is never any bad press written about them. They don't have any more money to support our children's education but they seem to all get raises every year. How about cutting some of the City's positions and giving the money to our children. Our taxes go up and up, our roads are terrible, crime has gone up, who cares if the police station is in the heart of South Norwalk? They are shooting each other right in front of the station? Have you seen all the FOR SALE signs? I wonder why? The CITY needs to support the Board of Education.

    ReplyDelete
  40. To 5:13. My post only appears once on my computer-- however, I did try several times to post it.

    ReplyDelete
  41. 4:43 AM--70% OF REAL ESTATE TAXES GO TO "EDUCATION" OF WHICH 40% GOES TO CENTRAL ORIFICE.

    Cut the bloat in the central office!

    ReplyDelete

ShareThis