Pages

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Communication Committee Launches: IT Director Presents Website, Sup Search Process Questionned

The newly formed Communications Committee of the Board of Education gathered in front of more than a dozen parents and community members for its inaugural meeting. 

Robert Poselli, the new IT director,  briefed the group about the new district website, which is anticipated to replace the current blue NPS website in March. (http://portal.norwalkps.org/default.aspx)

According to Dr. Polselli, some schools are already using the new portal and training is being conducted throughout the district to maximize its potential use. Each school has a technology liaison  that will further impart technical expertise throughout the school communities.

He emphasized that the site functions on a “distributed ownership model” which means that hundreds of people are able to post and modify information on the sites, as opposed to one or two.  For example,  teachers can post homework assignments and collaborate with other teachers on documents, instructional specialists can post curriculum,  and PTOs can update their events calendars.  There are two layers to the website:  a public side and a private side that is password protected that only teachers and administrators can access.  The site will have the capability to be translated into Spanish and Haitian Creole.

Dr. Polselli also said that the IT department is working on a notification system that will send messages to parents and staff based on their preferred mode of communication:  phone calls, emails, or text messages.  The notification system will be used initially for emergencies such as school closings and delays,  but can later be used for other reminders.   The notification system will roll out fully next year when information can be collected at the beginning of the year on the emergency cards and at open houses. The system will be different than NPS Connect which will be discontinued in favor another program.

At the meeting,  Lauren Rosato of the Norwalk Education Foundation summarized a letter that was written by the organizers, including NEF, of the Community Conversation held in October.   The letter focuses on the lack of two-way communication about the superintendent search process.  The letter states:
We respectfully request that you listen to what the community is saying especially as it relates to the superintendent search process. We believe that the search process is not being effectively communicated to the public, nor is the communication a two-way dialogue. Other than the Leadership Profile forums held in November, there has been no opportunity for the community’s input.

It has been reported that five candidates were interviewed, that one will return for a second interview, that a new interim starts shortly, that the job search continues, and that the final candidate will be presented to the public. The presentation of just a final candidate does not allow for dialogue with more than one candidate. We want to make sure there’s an airing of more than one person so the community feels comfortable with the decision the board is making.

We also would like to know what process is being followed for candidate interviews, what
questions are being asked, and how candidates are being disqualified. This is the most important decision that you will be making and it affects all of us. For this reason, community input should be considered.
The letter was signed by Coalition of Norwalk Neighborhood Associations, Greater Norwalk Chamber of Commerce,  Norwalk Community College, Norwalk Education Foundation, Norwalk League of Women Voters, Norwalk NAACP, Norwalk PTO Council, and state Senator Bob Duff.

In addition to the Board, the letter was sent to the 121 participants of the Community Conversation. 

Board Chair Glenn Iannacone said that there is “not a major public piece “ to the superintendent  search.   Communications Committee Chair Erin Halsey said that the public should have “trust in the Board.”

Mr. Iannacone did clarify that there may be more than one finalist brought before the public depending on the number of qualified candidates the board interviews.  

Ms. Halsey also discussed reaching out to local media outlets to make sure that good news about NPS was being reported.

5 comments:

  1. Don't these candidates currently have jobs? If the community and everyone else did the interviews, it would violate the privacy of the interview process, wouldn't it? Also, this is sounding more and more like an election than an interview.

    Concerned.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Once you are a finalist, you typically expect there to be some public knowledge.
    I think the bigger issue here is the lack of communication that persists between the Public School system/Board of Education and the community. People always blamed Corda for that problem. He is long gone and the problem is not so he was obviously not the source of the problem.
    It seems to me, if the State Dept. of Education was in fact keeping as close an eye on Norwalk as they are supposed to be, they would have taken over by now. We have been without a leader since last summer. The union leaders all signed a letter of no confidence in leadership at central office. And now many members of the community joined together to sign a letter stating their unhappiness with the superintendent search process and the poor communication skills generating from leadership.
    Unfortunately, seems like the state is sleeping on the job or they would have saved Norwalk from themselves by now. I am certainly doubting Norwalk's ability to do anything to help themselves. Every move they make is politically motivated. No one makes decisions based on what is right for the district and for the students. That's why they have to keep it secret. You can only be transparent if you have confidence you have made the right decision for the right reasons.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The last Board of Ed made all the rules for keeping the public out of the loop. They hired an interim superintendent who went right along with their little secret process because they were all convinced that they had a friend already in that esteemed central office who was going to waltz in. Thank the almighty that we put enough new blood to stop that little charade.
    As for secrets, do any of you forget that these old timers try to silence and attack the new people who dare to speak their minds? Let's all remember this when our district elections are held-- time for even more new people

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I inadvertently deleted the previous comment and can't seem to retrieve it. Sorry. Feel free to repost.

    ReplyDelete

ShareThis