Pages

Monday, February 1, 2010

Wake Up Residents of Norwalk!

This is a guest blog by Lisa Thomson, a parent, taxpayer, middle school PTC President, member of the District Data Improvement Team and after-school program provider.

Wake Up Residents of Norwalk!!!

Many of you may not be aware, but there’s a lot going on in the world of public school education these days.  If you’re a parent in the school system…or even if you aren’t, and you’re just a taxpayer…then take note of my TOP 10 List of NPS Organizational Issues and ask yourself the following:   

# 1  Educational Reform Is Not Unique to Norwalk, it’s a National Agenda.
  Education across this country is in desperate need of reforms that raise student achievement. But how best do we do it?  President Obama has repeatedly referred to our need to raise the bar, most recently in his State of the Union Address. His Race to the Top Program embodies many of the necessary goals and objectives and even the head of the Federation of Teachers Union, Randi Weingarten has acknowledged the need for reform.    Are you aware of the Race to the Top initiative, its goals or what our leaders think about reform in general?  

# 2  Accountability Begins at Home. Business as usual has NOT been working in America’s city school districts. Accountability is now en vogue, but it needs to be applied to everyone, not just the teachers!  It starts with kid’s personal accountability, hopefully instilled in the home and then in the schools.  We cannot, as a society, continue to beat up teachers, if at the same time, district policies allow ‘little Johnny do whatever he wants’ or claim that ‘it’s not little Johnny’s fault, or do not ‘reinforce little Johnny’s home study habits.’  Extreme parenting styles, ranging from ‘helicopter parenting, to outright child neglect’ spill over into the classroom.   Teachers cannot be expected to compensate for all the things that do or don’t happen in the home.   Where do you think accountability starts and how do you support your child’s teacher?

# 3  Set Higher Expectations and Standards for Kids At School!   Norwalk is a diverse school district that is to be celebrated. But children need to understand the concept of personal responsibility and achievement.  Home and classroom environments need to reinforce with children the value of setting goals and objectives.  Falling standards are not unique to Norwalk.  One need only listen to the news, to hear of the US’s low   math and science scores versus other industrialized nations, particularly those in Asia.   Sure, we all freak out when CMT testing begins...or do we?  Is PROFICIENT really where the bar should be set?  Shouldn’t ALL children, especially the one’s at higher risk, in lower income families, be expected to shoot towards the GOAL or ADVANCED ratings?  Does CMT testing drive the right behavior in our classrooms? Is everybody headed to college? Should everybody be headed to college? What about alternative trade schools?   What sorts of study, work ethics OR discipline do parents or schools instill in kids?  If kids screw off in class or don’t do their homework, do they get disciplined? Do parents or guardians get called or does the district let them slide?  High expectations don’t guarantee a child’s success in life, but low ones certainly seal their fate, setting them up for failure later. What policies do you think should be in place regarding academic expectations, options and consequences for students?

# 4  Student Data Through Common Assessments Is Helping  Reform HAS started in Norwalk and the  district has been recognized by the State, for its efforts in improving student achievement.  Analysis of student data is helping to  drive School Growth Plans, new teaching strategies and IS showing signs of progress, as many Norwalk schools met AYP last year.  But, we still have a long way to go, in terms of ensuring that the measures put in place drive the right adults actions/behavior in the schools and subsequently student achievement.  Do you know what AYP stands for or about the achievement gap?

# 5  Leaders Need to Lead.  As a parent and taxpayer, I expect principals and central office administrators to focus on driving changes that need to be made to outdated processes and ways of doing business.  Political in-fighting, and cries of cronyism at the top of the NPS food chain looks more like preservation of the status quo, especially, if I don’t see it linked back directly to the classroom. Leaders fail because they can’t build teams, fail to execute on plans, lack vision, and possess poor inter personal and communications skills.  Over 85% of the NPS budget is for staff and benefits.  Do I need to say more? What skills do you think educational leaders should have with regard to staff?

# 6  Elected Officials Need to Represent the People.  When recently elected B.O.E. members point to areas of inefficiency and/or ways to improve communication to the electorate they serve, those calling them irresponsible, look more like the Establishment that has contributed to the mess we find ourselves in. No SINGLE individual has dug the hole that we find ourselves in, but those obstructing the change that is needed, risk looking as though they have hidden self interests.    Do you think B.O.E. members should speak with one voice or should there be open debate?

# 7 Organizations Need Transparency and Checks and Balances.  Over the years, the B.O.E. has been perceived to rubber stamp most of the district’s practices. It has also demonstrated a public and parent communications policy, somewhat akin to the ‘white or black smoke blown up the chimney’ when selecting a new Pope.  We need transparent checks and balances on a host of district policies.  We also need more communication with the public that elected them.  Let’s hope that despite the chest pounding, B.O.E. members will come together and select a new superintendent who IS a true reformer, leader, team builder and communicator. One, who’ll mix things up, bring in some new thinking and challenge the secretive old- school style of management.    What do you think is the most important role of the B.O.E.?

# 8  Teams Going Through Change Need to Storm Before They Norm.  There are a lot of conversations and letters flying around right now by union representatives, administrators, anonymous NPS staff bloggers, B.O.E. members and parents (of which I include myself.)  I think this is all part of a necessary debate, in order for Norwalk to clean house. However, we must focus on ISSUES and SOLUTIONS that move our kids forward academically and not on unsubstantiated name calling.   Individuals, representing all aspects of NPS have had pent up feelings and attitudes that have been suppressed, contorted and distorted for years. The discourse, both written and verbal, while terse at times, is all part of the process associated with venting before we engage in change and reform.  What do parents and taxpayers think about all of the fighting going on?  Do you even know it’s happening?  

# 9  We’ll Have To Do  More With Less Money.  The reality of the situation is that we have no money. The ‘credit party’ that fueled property prices and the City’s tax base, IS OVER!   Education has historically gobbled up the lion’s share of our municipal tax dollars, but have shown little return in little Johnny’s academic results.  The reality of the situation is that we are going to have to tighten our belts people, and it’s going to be a bumpy ride.  Do you ever wonder why other country’s kids test better than ours, yet spend less than we do?

# 10  Take Care of the Classroom.  But, when all is said and done, without teachers, we have no educational system.  Last time I checked, most administrators don’t teach our kids.  Teachers need to be supported by parents and the community, now more than ever. Sure, some teachers are better than others, but most are incredibly dedicated and find themselves in a profession with HUGE systemic problems, while trying to teach little Johnny to read or write. They’re busy teaching our kids, so that means we as PARENTS need to be vigilant and stay on top of the issues, until we turn this educational ship around.   

So pay attention and get involved Norwalk!!!   Next year’s budget is being set and we need to come together and figure out a way to support the kids and the classrooms. Parents must take a stand and demand OPEN COMMMUNICATION, TEAMWORK, AND REAL LEADERSHIP from those hired and elected to be in charge, so that informed decisions can be made.  Things should improve when the superintendent position is filled. But, most likely, he or she will turn to us to do the things that we already know need to happen. So, WAKE UP Norwalk, wake up and get involved.  Your children and City need you.   

Lisa Thomson

Parent, Taxpayer, Middle School PTC President , Member of District Data Improvement Team
And After School Program Provider

30 comments:

  1. Thank you Lisa for taking the time to effectively communicate what many parents have been feeling for the last year. This posting should be communicated throughout every school in Norwalk.

    ReplyDelete
  2. From Thomas Jefferson's quill pen to Lisa Thompson's keyboard . . . many thanks from a concerned but optimiistic taxpayer, parent and citizen:
    "The most effectual means of preventing [the perversion of power into tyranny are] to illuminate, as far as practicable, the minds of the people at large, and more especially to give them knowledge of those facts which history exhibits, that possessed thereby of the experience of other ages and countries, they may be enabled to know ambition under all its shapes, and prompt to exert their natural powers to defeat its purposes." --Thomas Jefferson: Diffusion of Knowledge Bill, 1779. FE 2:221, Papers 2:526

    ReplyDelete
  3. For all the intensity of the activity in the prior post (42 comments!), particularly from employees of the school system, I am absolutely struck by the lack of activity in this post. It's spooky quiet in the blogosphere today. While clearly, a deep nerve was touched by the prior post, it seems to me, as an observing parent, that this post by Ms. Thomson is the one that everyone should be weighing in on. After all, she has tried to address head on the very difficult challenges facing our schools - not just here in Norwalk but across our country. And so timely, too, with the news of the administrations budget proposal today and the changes they are seeking for funding education (more competition) and for addressing the shortcomings of NCLB.

    I'd love to hear the thoughts of the teachers and administrators who follow this blog. What do you think about the questions Ms. Thomson raises?

    ReplyDelete
  4. As a teacher who speaks for no one but myself, I await the decision by the Board on the appointment of the new superintendent. I look forward to new blood (not a retired person)with a vision for Norwalk (not a rehash of what they did in their former district). I look for leadership that will take on the challenges with which we are faced. It is time for a bright, focused and fearless leader (who collects a paycheck only from being superintendent in Norwalk). I look forward to supporting a man or a woman who will lead us forward to really leaving no child behind. Norwalk children deserve the best! Please, BOE, give me my wish.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Not interested in Lisa's post. She's campaigning as usual. Self-serving.

    ReplyDelete
  6. 6:49 P.M. - I disagree. I've attended enough of the BOE meetings to know whether or not Ms. Thompson is being self-serving. All of the issues she brought forth are very legitimate and people need to be aware of them. Also, after each of her points, she asked a question as a springboard for the reader to consider the issues. And none of those questions were "leading questions" either. If she was campaigning or being self serving, the issues would contain position statements such as "I feel that the BOE...or the new Superintendent....or the unions...or whatever the issue is....should...." Instead, she gave a concise summary of three or four lines and wrapped it up with an "Take away" question - basically "What do YOU think?"

    I don't see anything wrong with that and actually believe that she highlighted a number of issues for people to consider.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think I noticed the biggest flaw with education today after reading this post. There is so much talk about unions, teachers, central office staff, the board, politics, test scores, achievement gaps, letters, budgets, and salaries I think we've lost touch with what's really important and thats the students. We all care for our kids but I fear we've let our own self interest replace theirs. Yes Lisa's post highlights significant problems in the district but it doesn't scratch the surface of what's really going on. We don't talk about the gang violence. We don't talk about racial tension. We don't talk about any of the pressures students face even before they get into the classroom. Why? We don't talk to the students. We talk of and about the students but not to them. I was there only twelve years ago. No one ever asked me why I did as poorly as I did. Everyone assumed the problem was my teachers, my home life, or drugs but they never gave me a chance to explain that I had to spend most of my energy just fitting in. I had to constantly buy new clothes to avoid harassment. I had to deal with racial slurs. I had to deal with sex. I had to deal with a learning disability. When it came down to it CMTs were the least of my worries. It's taken many years of therapy to release the feelings I had harbored since my experience at NPS. As it turns out the CMTs were wrong I'm actually a pretty smart guy. I went to college, got a masters degree, and have a pretty high paying job. Above all I'm pretty damn happy considering the times. I realize now that I could have asked for help but I truly didn't believe there was any help for me at the time. So if it's of any relevance today that's why my CMT scores were so bad. Sorry to let you down Mr. and Mrs. Teachers and Administrators of my era.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Dave S - thank you for your brave post. I am a teacher who is very troubled by the small amount of time that I get to "know" my elementary students and work with them on social skills issues. Every second of my day is planned to maximize the amount of time I can provide literacy instruction – there is literally no time to chat with a student, comfort a student, find out what their concerns and worries are. Bravo to you for your success in life and clear articulation that children are more than their CMT scores.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Dave S.
    I loved reading your post. And I agree. I am a parent of 2 and I could care less about CMT scores. It's the biggest failure of our educational system, teaching to the tests and placing so much importance on them. Education should be so much more about the whole person and so much less about one test which takes place during two weeks of the year. What's important to me is if the kids are passionate about learning. Is their curiosity being fed? How is this test going to help them in their future if it destroys their passion for learning? If things don't change in the public school system, I would be willing to take them out and put them in private schools, at whatever cost. And I don't have the money--but watching the public schools destroy their thirst for learning is more than I could handle. I'm doing my part--my kids are great kids--please let's WAKE UP and have the schools do their part.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I am going to tell you the single biggest problem the town has overall.

    Over 90% of the budget goes to salaries and debt service. Those two numbers have traditionally increased about 2-3% per year.

    So your expenses are going up year after year after year.

    The revenue picture is not so pretty. With house prices dropping the assessments are either going to have to be flat or lower.

    They will need to increase the mill rate to make up the shortfall between the expense and revenue.

    So we are going to see an increase in taxes with very little change in the educational quality.

    Raise your hand if you want less services for more money.

    I am strongly of the belief that all this garbage the BOE promotes makes no difference at all. We just want to make sure everyone feels good about themselves. No tracking, special ed in every school, etc,etc, etc. So we lower the bar to make sure we have a big old group hug.

    It is just stupidity and totally inefficient. The town needs someone with financial analysis skills to come in and perform an appropriate assessment and make actionable recommendations.

    So here is a freebie...why not take all the special ed classes that are spread across all the schools and put it in one place. Make it a shining example for other districts. Make it a Special Ed Magnet School. This way you can cut some expense, increase the service and probably have grant money pouring in. Now that is thought leadership.

    ReplyDelete
  11. To 8:33 poster. I agree that it's all about the money. But here is my freebie...why not take the money that is supposed to be spent on special ed and actually spend it on special ed, rather than just hand it over to the lawyers. This way, you can cut a big expense, increase the service, and increase efficiency.

    ReplyDelete
  12. 8:33 what you propose in setting up a "Special Ed Magnet" would in essence ghettoize kids who need extra help because of their learning, physical, and or mental challenges.

    I would rather see us stop hiring individuals who are:
    a) not qualified (that means you Dir. of Elementary Ed);

    b) retired and won't get off the public pay roll (that means you Interim Sup, Interim Dir. Elementary Ed, Interim CFO, and all other interims);

    c) don't live in our Fairfield County community; (that means you Dir of Technology commuting on your private plane from MA);

    d) spending are tax paying dollars on legal fees to deny special needs children the services they are entitled to (that means you Dir. of Special Ed)

    So many things are wrong with this system. And lets not forget the BOE. It's headed by a Fire Marshall who should have his hands full keeping the city from burning down, but somehow has enough time to moonlight as the head of our school. The Vice Chair is a Pizza Parlor owner who probably wasn't the brightest bulb at school. Then there's the only minority on the BOE who demonstrates everytime she opens her mouth to comment that all the worst stereotypes people have about unqualified individuals is true (I mean seriously would any company put Ms. Rivas on their board of directors). All Ms. Halsey and Ms. Keyes are well meaning but are similarly over their heads. The only truly effective BOE members are Steve Colarossi and Sue Haynie -- and they get beat up by the others because they actually believe in accountability.

    The people of Norwalk have a bad school system because they have bad unqualified adults running the show.

    At the end of the day the Mayor or the State needs to take over and clean house top to bottom.

    I'm sorry for my rant but enough is enough. It is $150 million after all.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Didn't this board hire the new tech guy from Mass? He flies in daily, and oh, by the way, can't stay for night meetings. The board said that was ok and on snow days, he can work from home. What?????

    The recent members of the board, Sue and Steve, talk about accountability and yet, why was this guy hired???

    Also, it will be interesting to see who the board picks for the interim. My bet is that they will throw Tony D. under the bus and pick someone who knows nothing about our district.

    Further, the budget is going to be a blood bath and who is going to guide the district through this most difficult time? Hayney and co. are so busy demeaning everyone, they cannot see that they need some of the good people who actually know more than they do. You cannot balance a budget without some seasoned personnel to help. At a recent board meeting, no one in the room knew what two sets of initials represented. Tony came to the rescue. He told them what they were. He has been filling in as the super for the last 11 years. Who do you think was in charge when Lang was teaching a class and Corda was playing golf, or at a Harvard workshop, or in Flordia or--you get the picture.......

    Let us send good wished to this board. I will light a candle for the district, the kids, and the teachers. We are going to need all the help we can get..

    I also bet that the new super is a dud with a capital D. Who would want to lead this district with a bickering board who puts their own political agenda ahead of the students? Let's hope that this one is not a retiree. Every group that gave qualifications for a good super put that at the top of the list.

    We are in the worst mess I have ever seen.

    ReplyDelete
  14. 11:40, you are my hero! You are so right about everything you said. I know because I was there. Everyone who reads the above post by 11:40 AM, you are getting the absolute truth.

    ReplyDelete
  15. 11:10am, you are my hero! In my opinion, you have hit the nail on the head. I couldn't agree more with everything you said. Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Hey- 11:40 and the other bashers-- don't know if you saw the newspapers in November, but your team lost the election because taxpayers like my husband and me lost faith in you.
    Your message just dosen't make any sense to us (you know, the tax paying people who have kids in the schools).
    Your ousted former protectors put together the supt. search process, but now that they are not there to steer their boy through it, the process is suddenly all messed up. You're all big fans of the fable-spinning Interim Supt., I guess because you thought he was going to keep the seat warm for your boy.
    The bashers complain about the IT Director-- even though their choice for Interim Supt. presented him to the Board of Ed as the only qualified candidate he saw. [By the way, can any of you actually point out any agreement signed by the chairman giving the new IT guy permission to leave early or not come to work on snow days??? If anyone made a deal it was Papallo]
    So then the bashers have to make some political hay out of that mixup so they blame Sue Haynie for that appointment-- ok, it's good to be critical. BUT WAIT, the bashers don't want anyone to be critical about their friends, so they fault everyone else who doesn't support the new Director of Elem. Ed-- hey, same interim supt. picked them both and both times only sent one resume to the Board for rubber stamping. It was all in the Friday packets that are finally posted on the school dept. website (thanks to the new people for that).
    So, Bashers, let's try to be honest about your political shennanigans and your games to protect your friends while the rest of us are honest about our hope that the entire Board of Ed stands up against all you're doing to try to divide Norwalk.

    ReplyDelete
  17. 7:55 am, wholy cow!! You are only feeding my fire of having issues with the hiring practices. You certainly shed some light on the circumstances. All I can say is not only was the wrong guy hired but it appears he also gets such a sweetheart deal, I'm surprised AIG didn't think of these perks.
    Someone on the board had better stand up and justify the hiring process.

    ReplyDelete
  18. 11:40 - WHO has been filling in as superintendent for "at least the past 11 years"??? The other day, you (or someone of your ilk) said that he was the de facto ASSISTANT superintendent for a number of years. I had little respect for the former assistant superintendent, but I know that isn't true.

    I guess there is still a fan club who hope he will somehow become superintendent, and so they are making up unsubstantiated assertions to support his candidacy. (By the way, if your argument is that he was the "real" superintendent (or assistant superintendent), are you assigning blame for the current mess to him? I thought not.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Someone please tell me that it isn't true that the director of IT has permission to miss night meetings and to stay home when the weather is bad. Please tell me that this is someone's idea of a bad joke. It can't be true, can it?

    ReplyDelete
  20. There are 2 parts to this 1 post.

    Dear Bloggers,
    I feel compelled to post to this blog out of frustration/pride to what I am reading here about the IT position that was recently filled but also out of anger and an overwhelming sense of an unfair hiring process. I was one of the finalists applying for the IT position; for all I know, there were only 2 of us to begin with. My experience with the interview process was what I would consider fine until I heard the results, which were not easy to swallow. Once that happened, I literally stumbled upon this blog and began to read a lot into what was going on in Norwalk from the perspective of quite a few anonymous and not-so-anonymous posters. After my initial interview, which I thought could not have gone better, I was immediately asked if my Superintendent could be called and when could I start, which I replied he certainly could and said my contract said 60 days by my Superintendent said a month is OK by him. He and I had chatted about my application and he was receptive to fielding a call on my behalf. In the next couple of days, he did not get a call so I took the initiative to email Fay to give her my Superintendent's school number, but still no contact was made. A month later, the second interview was with Mr. Daddona, Mr. Norris, and Mr. Papallo. At this time, I thought the interview went well as well. I thought my credentials of being a Director of Technology for 10 years, along with my soon-to-be obtained CT 092 license (which I finally did receive a week after Dr. Polselli was hired) and oodles of experience and a great penchant for spending money wisely were exactly what Norwalk needed. Not only that but I've been the Director of IT for not only a school district but also for an entire town(police/fire/town hall/library/dpw) as well. Knowing I have all these technical, political and educational skills made me feel like a shoe-in candidate. Plus, I am a minority. On top of that, I was willing to relocate to CT(I live in RI) knowing that the job would require me to be closer to be able to stay late when needed and be available when needed. An administrative job can not be a telecommute job.
    During my second interview, I was again asked by Mr. Daddona if my Superintendent could be contacted and I said yes. Unbeknownst to me, that contact was never made and the decision was made to hire Mr. Polselli. I need to note here I have no ill will toward Mr. Polselli. In addition to that question, I made the statement that I would soon have my CT 092 license, which Mr. Papallo resonded that that would not be necessary and then he asked me when I could start and I told him 1 month from the nofication date of hire. Anyway, to hear that Mr. Polselli was the only qualified candidate and after that finding out none of my references were called, especially my immediate Superintendent was highly insulting to say the least. He almost responded to this blog claiming the process was a farce, but he didn't and he shouldn't.

    ReplyDelete
  21. part 2

    Quite honestly, I don't really care who made the ultimate decision to hire. Those who could have made the process even remotely fair are just as guilty since they simply said nothing in the face of an obvious form of favoritism.
    I can handle losing a fair fight but my experience was far from fair, having a well traveled and experienced Superintendent say I was not even qualified tells me he is either a terrible judge of a good employee or blind to what the job requires and entails. Simply put, you would never expect a school district to use completely unfair hiring practices so it has to be one or both of the first 2 I mentioned above. Or it certainly could also include unfair hiring techniques.
    Whatever the case, it is neither here nor there. What's done is done. What Norwalk needs to do first and foremost is to clean up its relationships from within. The Tech. Dir. needs to be able to meet with the Principals about their building needs without feeling he is getting inside information. This mistrust must be cured by a Superintendent and he or she absolutely needs the full support of the BOE to allow him/her to show the door to those who are unwilling to work together. You can have great talent but if they do not work well together, the system becomes dysfunctional, much like it appears to be. Perhaps then, some public trust can be built back into the system. All will take time.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Anon 9:30pm, I cannot believe that someone with such political expertise would expose himself in public like you did in your post. If there were only 2 candidates in the process, you have totally burned your bridges in a very public way in this area. Education is an incestuous game in CT, as we are such a small state. I'm torn between wondering if the above post is fiction or if you someone could actually be so politically naive as to have all but signed his/her name to such a posting as the 1 of only 2 candidates who interviewed for the job. It's hard to believe.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I want the rumor substantiated as to whether or not the new IT director has special provisions to work from home/telecommute and to choose his own start and end time for his job. If he has those rights, I want them, too. Where's my union leader? This is where his energy should be placed--defending our negotiated contract--not sending out hate mail against central office.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Dear Anonymous 9:41,
    Are you serious??? There is so much information, truth AND rumor, in this blog it's crazy.
    Truth is, I really have no worries about who in Norwalk NOW thinks ill of me as opposed to before I sent the post. I chose to apply in Norwalk because a lot of Norwalks needs fit right into my strengths, the salary was appealing, and quite honestly the HR dept. was very kind in their correspondences with me, giving me the impression of some great central office staff.
    But I don't think you realize how important, legally, conducting a fair hiring process is. Some people are easily willing to go to court over lesser processes than the hiring process I went through. This is not about me protecting my political or professional career, it is about exposing the white elephant in the room when no one else is simply willing to see it and talk about it.
    You certainly have the right to question the validity of my post, although you would be absolutely wrong. You are also welcome to insinuate anything from it. Quite frankly I do not care.
    My intention was to set the record straight and give you my experience to back up my claim.
    So, yes, this is Anthony Tomah, sending this again. It's easy to criticize when you can hide behind anonymous and are not in the middle of the issue. I took the risk of explaining my point of view. Being blacklisted is not my concern. I will not turn this into a conversation between you and I, however. I'll let the posters post their rebuttles and perhaps I'll respond, perhaps not but I most certainly will leave my name on the post if I do.

    ReplyDelete
  25. "If you’re a parent in the school system…or even if you aren’t, and you’re just a taxpayer…"

    JUST a taxpayer, Ms. Thomson? Meaning "merely"?More than 60% of our property taxes goes to educating your children in this city whether or not we have students in the system. So kindly refrain from calling us "just taxpayers". It is insulting and disrespectful.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Diane C. . .very well said! Sometimes, Ms. Thomson, you need to not have so very very much to say, so you can have an opportunity to listen more. Your mouth runneth over...far too often.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Those are interesting posts from the unsuccessful candidate for IT. I recall reading that there was a minority candidate for director of elementary education, a woman with years of central office experience IN NORWALK and building experience at the elementary level IN NORWALK. From what I have heard, she has been successful as a building principal in Bridgeport. How is it that the board of education instead hired someone who has no known elementary experience and who has never been a principal? (If my understanding of the facts is wrong, someone please correct me because I don't want to spread false information. However, if you are going to correct me, don't merely say, as someone once did, that she has elementary experience. I want to know what that experience was.)

    ReplyDelete
  28. No disrespect intended Diane C. 'just' wanting to get folks to see that education is an issue for ALL citizens whether they have children or not and/or whether they are in public school or not. You are ABSOLUTELY correct...YOU ARE paying alot in taxes and should expect accountability.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Anon 8:52, I'm not sure why Norwalk feels compelled to recycle past employees who left us for greener pastures and to take them back into the fold again and again, even when they leave us high and dry for their own personal gain. If this scenario were a personal relationship we'd call it abusive. But in our human resources issues, we just look the other way as though there are no other viable candidates and the well has run dry. I say, if people choose to leave us to advance their careers, good for them. But once you leave us, say goodbye and continue on your track up the ladder on your own. We don't need to keep recycling people once they leave and want come back for another slice of the fatted calf. Not so easy out there as you thought it would be right? Welcome to the real world. I say out with the old and in with the new. In my view, I don't think the hiring committee did us wrong by not moving this experienced candidate forward in the process. Why invest in this person again. . .so this person could leave us once again when opportunity comes their way? I prefer loyalty.

    ReplyDelete
  30. 6:19 - I understand what you're saying, and I am not entirely in disagreement because it is bad to think of Norwalk as an opportunist's revolving door. I don't know that to be the case with the person we're discussing though, in part because she didn't leave without notice; the district had appropriate time to find a replacement. While I don't have specific information, I speculate that she went to Bridgeport because a principalship was available there. There is nothing wrong with a person who wants to advance in the profession.

    Her being a member of a minority group isn't the major issue to me, although I still think it looks bad that she wasn't afforded the opportunity to interview before the board of education because she has the requisite background and skills to do the job. The board wouldn't necessarily have to hire her if they deemed someone better qualified.

    Some in Norwalk too often value seniority over skillset and personal relationships (with other board personnel) over true qualifications. Some within the district also value vendettas over honest assessments of talent and unquestioned loyalty (never a good thing because we benefit from having people challenge our thinking) over open mindedness.

    However, no matter who it is, no matter what my personal relationship with or feelings toward the person, if I think the person is qualified for a position, I will say so. I will also say it when I had questions, doubts or objections.

    ReplyDelete

ShareThis