Pages

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

Nast Presents Initial Budget Reductions

At the Board of Education meeting Tuesday night, interim Superintendent Michael Nast made his first proposals for reduction. The Norwalk Board of Estimation and Taxation and City Council have asked the BOE to cut its budget by $5 million. So far, Nast thinks he can find $3 million. “Let me stress that these are suggestions that my staff and I have come up with. We are trying to make this a collaborative process,” Nast. “I am always open for suggestions.”

Changes, consolidation and reduction of teaching staff make up the bulk of savings. For example, 43 teachers are projected to retire. New teachers cost less to hire so this will result in considerable savings. In addition, Nast proposed the reduction of three teachers at the Alternative Middle School at Briggs who currently teach only four students.

More controversial is the proposed reduction of five high school teachers and four middle school teachers. To achieve this, Assistant Superintendent Tony Daddona will review course selections and enrollments along with principals. “Every program needs to be audited,” said Nast. Daddona will also review the pros and cons of the current eight-period day versus a seven-period day in the high schools. “This will all be done with the discretion of the principal. We’ll need to have a committee to work on this,” he said. “We won’t move without concrete data.”

Rowayton and Naramake are not likely to get modular classrooms next year. The lunch program is running a surplus since there are more kids signed up for free and reduced lunch this year. The surplus will go towards paying a portion of the cafeteria staff’s health benefits. The purchasing department is ordering fewer printing supplies next year. Nast is proposing an immediate “spending freeze". The savings from this year will carry over to next year.

Nast said he is talking to the two biggest unions—the teachers and administrators—about possible givebacks. The Norwalk Federation of Teachers, who negotiated a 1% raise for next year, say they netted the district considerable savings by switching health plans. “Their position is ‘We don’t renegotiate contracts,’” said Nast. The Norwalk Association of School Administrators, however, has not shut out the possibility of givebacks. They have said that they want the BOE to exhaust all other savings possibilities first, according to Nast.

Nast expressed concern last night about where to find the other two million dollars. “We need to convince the BET that we can’t go lower than this, beyond this we really impact programming” said Nast. “But we also need to plan for the worst case scenario.”

Nast said that several items are on the table: assistant principal positions, house master positions, changing class sizes and a return to half-day kindergarten. Those did not sit well with the board. The district should be expanding pre-school, not taking away full day kindergarten, said several board members upon hearing Nast’s dire options.

Nast also recommended reevaluating class size in certain situations. However, this would also require opening up the teachers' contract. According to Dan Cook, Chief Financial Officer, Norwalk has the lowest student teacher ratio in the area.

A couple of board members were not happy with the teacher’s union non-renegotiating stance. “It is nasty out there. The teacher’s should be damn thankful they have a job,” said Board Member Jack Chiaramonte. “If we all give a little bit, we will all survive.”

Board Member Erin Halsey said that she lost her job ten months ago. “In the real world you don’t have choices. A lot of people have taken a hit.” Lisa Thomson, a parent who spoke during public comments, called the union’s position “un-American.”

Board Member Steve Colarossi tried to temper the strong emotions. “We shouldn’t fall into the trap of finger pointing. We negotiated the contract in the same recession as the one we are in now. There must be room for compromise.”

The BET’s public hearing on the draft budget will take place on March 24th at 7:30pm in the Community Room at City Hall. Parents can comment on the budget at this meeting.

14 comments:

  1. A sign of good leadership is recruiting good volunteers. Why are parents not tapped more as a resource for the administration or classroom? It would be my pleasure to work a few hours a week or more to help meet a need in my child's school as my skills and talents warranted. Energize and empower your parents!

    ReplyDelete
  2. There is such a thing as confidentiality. Other than teachers and administration or the child's parents, no on has a right to know a child's weaknesses or business. Those working or volunteering in the schools should have a degree to work w/ children and should pass a test confirming they are not pedophiles or abusing drugs. In one elementary school in particular, there are too many parents around and they gossip about the students or pat themselves on the back for helping a poor, struggling student, instead of patting the student on the back for a job well done, which they would know to do if they were TRAINED.

    LET US GET BACK TO REAL EDUCATION! STOP THE EDUCATIONAL SOCIAL CLUB!

    ReplyDelete
  3. If there are only four students in the alternative middle school, why is there a need for that program? It would be less costly to educate the alternative middle school students in private schools. For the same money, the board of education could send them to private boarding schools.

    The Norwalk High School schedule is too expensive to run, but how can the person who was principal there when it was devised be the same person to head the committee to discuss whether or not it should continue? He may be able to maintain objectivity, but people will wonder if, in fact, he was objective.

    ReplyDelete
  4. If I am not mistaken, the teachers offered a contract extension at the beginning of negotiations and the board rejected it and things got nasty and the Board forced it to go to Binding arbitration where the teachers ended up with increases. The Board should have been more willing to negotiate then when they should have been negotiating, not now when it is a done deal. As one Board member said, we were in the same recession when the contract was negotiated.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I find it very disheartening that the union leadership would rather see teachers let go rather than agree to a pay freeze for a year or so until the economy improves. The private sector does not have that option. Look around other school districts in the country, it's already started.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The three teachers in the alternative middle school are being paid for out of a grant. What good does that do for the local budget?????

    ReplyDelete
  7. Because maybe the grant can pay for something else.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Is a grant allowed to do that? I thought grants were for innovative projects. From what I've been told, grants aren't supposed to fund the 'something elses' that are already funded locally.

    ReplyDelete
  9. How innovative is a program where you send kids to be in a holding tank. Do something innovative over there before you label it innovation when you are trying to save your own neck! Everyone knows that program is a joke.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thank you, Mr. Michael Nast, for taking the reins of this bucking bronco called NPS and trying to break it. You have done more for us parents and teachers in terms of communication and leadership than we have seen done in a number of years. You help us see what it could be like here if we did things right. Thanks for not being content to just be a seat-warmer like the last guy who was interim.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Bruce Morris must go! How about the BOE having enough guts to finally cut a position that pays full time for a politician who fails to show up much of the time. To think that they are considering cutting teaching positions while keeping him on the payroll is unbelievable.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Is it time to take a serious look at re-districting? I’ve seen first hand that some schools are busting at the seams, while others have much smaller populations.

    ReplyDelete
  13. we do need to look at redistricting. norwalk does not need 12 elementary schools. it also doe snot need a politiciian on staff. folks at central office say he is never there...if the average work week is 37-40 hours, and he is not visible at least 50% of that time, then where is he? who is he accountable to, what does he do? he is very good at hiding, and covering up for issues that seem to never get dealt with...
    how about that diversity training that all of the central office folks had to go to? all because one person made very inappropriate comments to another employee, and everyone had to be trained...a waste of manpower hours, and training that was a canned program.
    Susan Marks, if she accepts will have to have a heart of steel, a mind of to handle the worst of challenges, and a way to move forward, clean out the dead wood, and rip up the carpet because there are the lies, and old baggage.

    ReplyDelete
  14. the alt. middle program is a waste, and unfortunately has been a holding tank for some staff they didn't know what to do with. one staff member who was on leave for sexual harassment and now is put there ...working with students who are already in a bad place and vulnerable...what and who made that choice?????
    corda, daddona, and ruotolo.
    another situation where a union protects those it shouldn't

    ReplyDelete

ShareThis