Pages

Wednesday, June 9, 2010

BOE Approves Budget and New Sup Contract

A version of this story appears on The Daily Norwalk.

It’s official--the BOE has a new budget and a new superintendent.   After more than six months of review, and just weeks before the start of the new fiscal year, the BOE unanimously approved the 2010-11 budget.  In addition, the Board unanimously approved incoming Superintendent Susan Marks' contact, which includes a $200,000 salary and $30,000 annuity.


In a statement, Marks writes: "I appreciate the confidence that the Board of Education, staff, community have shown in me. I pledge to work in collaboration with all stakeholders to make the Norwalk Public Schools an outstanding school system for all our students. I have met extraordinary people in Norwalk who are committed to working with me to increase student performance and ensuring that our students are prepared for college and the world of work."

In passing the $150 million budget the BOE capped a process that cut more than $5 million from its original request to the city in order to meet the number approved by the Board of Estimate and Taxation. Only a few members of the public attended last night's meeting that took place in a largely empty concert hall at City Hall.  There was little to protest in this budget that cut no programs or staff causing many parents to stay home.

Although this budget had no controversial cuts, Board Member Jodi-Bishop Pullan emphasized there will be fewer supplies and money in the schools.  ”The public has to know that this isn’t going to be easy,” Interim Superintendent Nast illustrated this with an example. “We’ll have our teachers, but we may have dirty floors,” he said.

Board member Migdalia Rivas dominated the discussion of the budget prior to approval, asking for clarifications on dozens of line items in the budget.  “Next time we this budget needs to clearer,” she said.  “I would really like to know the impact of each one of these cuts and which grants will be used to cover the cuts.”   Board Member Sue Haynie also said that it would helpful to have a department like Special Education disaggregated since the department’s line items are spread throughout the budget.

The budget did not include the reduction of an Assistant Principal Position from West Rocks that was going to be backfilled with grant funding as was previously recommended.

Board Member Steve Colarossi confirmed with Assistant Superintendent Tony Daddona that the reduction of five high school teaching positions through attrition would not increase the number of student study halls.  “We looked carefully at the scheduling and are making sure that the students are getting all their credits,” said Daddona.

Nast said that the Briggs Middle School program that currently employs three full time teachers for approximately a dozen students is going to “restructured and not eliminated” to be more efficient.  In order to give Briggs more resources, Rivas suggested eliminating the Director of Elementary Education position and combining it with the Grants position in Central office, a recommendation that has been brought up in previous meetings.  After the meeting, Nast said that “this district needs a person that does nothing but write grants.”  “I wouldn’t touch that,” he said.

Board Chair Glenn Iannaccone said the budget process was different this year than in past years.  “There was so much collaboration, We have a new team,” he said after the meeting referring largely to the interim Superintendent.  “The budget was not done in a vacuum, alone up in an office like before.  Many groups were involved, especially the unions.”

40 comments:

  1. How is it possible that cutting five teachers at the high schools won't result in students' being in more study halls? The only possible explanations I can think of are:

    1. High school enrollments are decreasing. If I recall correctly the budget document information (which I couldn't find when I looked this a.m.), this may be true at NHS, but I think BMHS enrollment will be stable.

    2. The positions are all for elective courses and there are enough elective courses that are undersubscribed to make up for the loss of teachers. Given the number of students in study halls at both schools, I very much doubt that this is true. Also, students may be forced to take electives that they don't want. Furthermore, I don't know if these are all teachers of electives.

    3. Class enrollments will be higher next year.

    Can anyone think of other possibilities?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I thought it was a sad commentary that all high school students will be getting able to get all their credits. Is that are standard?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Glenn, what you don't realize is that the grant person does not write new grants. The grants are entitlements and are not competetive. The combination of the two jobs, Director of Elementary Ed and grants is absolutely doable. At one time, the Supervisor for grants also was the Supervisor for Language Arts K-12. Not combining these positions is a huge huge huge mistake! Migdalia Rivas is right.

    ReplyDelete
  4. 10:27 - You are right. If providing enough staff to meet the minimum number of credits for graduation is considered acceptable to the AS in charge of curriculum and instruction, as well as to the board of education, then Norwalk schools are indeed in a very sad state, especially because Norwalk doesn't require that many credits in the first place.

    Imagine the shock when Norwalk has to hire a significant number of teachers to meet the new state graduation requirements. This will be an even greater problem because the stimulus money will be gone by then.

    And then, what if CT doesn't get Race to the Top money, even after changing the laws regarding graduation? The money is definitely not assured. Even if CT does get RTTT funding, Norwalk won't likely get as much money as it will have to expend for additional staffing.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Well reasoned, 12:29. Another case of those in the crow's nest forgetting their binoculars. We all know what happened next.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Eliminate the Director of Elem Ed and have the AP evaluate the 12 elementary principals. Then the newly appointed ELem Ed person can go back to grants. Of course she doesn't even write competitive grants, so I can't see why she can't do both jobs. BOE, why aren't you looking in to what she really does?

    ReplyDelete
  7. I suggest that the BOE review the number of students in each high school who average more than one study hall a day. My guess is that you will all be shocked. A few years back, we had students who, on some days, had more than two study halls.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Bruce Kimmel, I very much doubt that we will see that data because it is so bad, and I agree that most of the public would be shocked.

    A better response from the AS would have been that any cuts in staff will result in a loss to students and that everyone is disappointed. If he has to toe the party line, he could have added that he also knows that there are tough choices to be made, but then he might also be asked to explain why certain other positions weren't cut instead. To say that all of the students will get their required credits is very stupid. It suggests that everything is okay, when it is not.

    ReplyDelete
  9. it is amazing how you don't have your facts. first of all it is true the former Lang. Arts person a good friend of the asst. supt., did do lang arts and grants, but the job is no where near what it is today. both jobs are quite different. the district is now looking to hire a grants person that will write competitive grants as well as the actual compliance grants.
    the director of elementary education position has many responsibilities, and maybe if folks were not so critical and quick to jump the gun they would let the new supt. get on board let her staff work with her. this district is very toxic and no matter who comes into a position it is pounce time...
    there are still sour grapes out there because some didn't get what they want, and some administrators are just on a mission...and the wrong one...
    move on folks---give up your bacstabbing, behind the scenes scheming and think about academics.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Actually there are plenty of folks who need to move on... I hope Susan Marks will figure that at in due course.

    ReplyDelete
  11. 5:28, I am assuming you work at central office, given your knowledge of who is friends with whom, etc. I just hope you are not an administrator because you can't write or spell correctly.
    With that said, just how are both jobs so different? The entitlement grants didn't change so much. What are you protecting, or should I say 'Who are you protecting?'

    ReplyDelete
  12. Actually, the former language arts person, Dr. Fitzgerald, was in charge of language arts and athletics, not language arts and grants. There was another language arts person for a couple of years after her, but he resigned to go to another school district. He wasn't in charge of grants either.

    The former executive assistant to the superintendent was first hired to be a grant writer, but that job didn't last very long. It morphed into Dr. Corda's executive assistant, who had no responsibility for writing grants.

    ReplyDelete
  13. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  14. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  15. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I'm a parent. I just don't care about the inside politics all these central office workers, friends and enemies keeping spewing here.
    This is what I care about--
    Why did the Board of Ed approve that silly budget in January if there was obviously about $5Million that could be cut without layoffs or stopping programs?
    Why did the superintendent and his crew keep making insane suggestions-- like cutting academically talented, going to half-day kindergarten and other stuff that would hurt our kids, when all they needed to do was look for the waste?
    Seeing how different this year's budget process was over last years makes me proud that we finally have parents and not more politicians on that board of ed.

    ReplyDelete
  17. 3:06 - I'm assuming you really know why the superintendent threatened to cut those programs. The tactic is old and tired, but superintendents continue to use it.

    It further weakens whatever credibility the board and central office have left with the taxpaying public when the board proves it can cut $5 million, while still, as the Assistant Superintendent said, "making sure that the students are getting all their credits." And they did this without taking the second assistant principal from WRMS, without cutting the elementary assistants, the high school housemasters, the director of elementary education, the director of human relations, and other such positions that people have suggested cutting.

    I am waiting for someone to tell the public the truth about this budget.

    ReplyDelete
  18. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Simple question from a parent- - -
    Does anyone from the Central Office ever apologize to us for scaring us with doomsday scenarios for months?

    ReplyDelete
  20. Can I give a mom's perspective?
    I deal with enough "drama" with a fifth grader and a seventh grader- I come here for information and a little insight, not for more he-said, she-said games.

    Leave AS, or AP, and whoever Stiskal is alone- like most parents, I don't care who is in the Central office.

    I'm just trying to figure out how the last interim superitendent yelled that there wasn't any waste in the central office, the new guy was scaring us that the elementary and middle schools would be taking big hits, but now we're ok? I heard some people screaming that union givebacks were 100% needed to stop layoffs. The article doesn't mention any union deals and there aren't layoffs.

    What gives?

    ReplyDelete
  21. Where is the union grievance over the appointment of the Director of Elementary Education?

    ReplyDelete
  22. 4:46 p.m.

    About study halls, this matter was discussed ad nauseum in one of the Finance meetings. NHS has a rotating schedule to allow all the students who take two classes in the same subject, such as Band and Orchestra, or two science classes. It's complicated and I can't even begin to explain it, but the rotating schedule also results in open ended days. BMHS has a different set up and some of the students are assigned to a specialize study hall where they have extra help in a particular subject. I don't remember what it is called.

    ReplyDelete
  23. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  24. 4:25 - Neither a rotating schedule nor a fixed schedule results in open ended days if a student has a class every period, instead of study halls. Kids leave early not because they have jobs, but because they just don't schedule classes, and no one stops that. Kids who aren't as motivated think it's great.

    The NHS schedule is labor intensive, in that the school needs a greater number of teachers to support the schedule. At BMHS, you say some students get help in special study halls? If a study hall has 25 students, just how many of them can get help? And who is to say that the study hall teacher knows anything about the subject in which a student needs help?

    ReplyDelete
  25. 5:04, you don't have an agenda? Well then, you certainly have claws! What possessed you to add information that was nasty? What possessed you to add any further information at all?
    You are so wrong in your accusations. If she is still in the area, I have it in mind to let her know what is being said. Be careful. You are being libelous and trying to destroy the reputation of a good person who is now retired. Why would you even do that?

    Take the advice of others here. Stop the toxicity.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Oh boy. Someone here needs to get a life!

    With all that is going on, we need to move forward, hold people accountable, and stop trying to sanctify the dear departed and retired.

    Times have changed, and as a previous poster wrote, things are different than they were when someone held the position of Language Arts and Grants. Way different. CALI, DDDM, SRBI, NCLB just to name a few.

    You can't look back on the 'good old days' and think we can return to them. No one is trying to destroy anyone's good reputation. Just be realistic.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Being the insomniac chairperson of the BOE's Finance Committee, I'd like to try to respond to some of the concerns raised in the previous postings.
    Regarding study halls, the initial analysis indicated that Norwalk High School, despite having greater course selections, had more students in study halls. This was counter-intuitive to the reasons we had been given for why the 8-period day (with its increased costs) was implemented. Therefore, we wanted to wait until the initial scheduling run could be undertaken to decide if the teaching position reductions could be implemented without a significant impact on students. We were assured that students would still have sufficient elective choices and that there would not be an increase in study halls. My own recent experience at Norwalk High School regarding study halls is that they could be reduced by simply employing more efficient scheduling-- right now, there are a number of courses that are taught in two parts, with each part being an individual half-year course. In many instances, these two half-courses are not offered in the same block, leading students to have a gap in one semester. Also, allowing older students to come in late or leave early if they have a study hall in the first or last period of the day provides an incentive for them to take study halls which could also skew the numbers. Bottom line on the study hall issue—the numbers are more than just a factor of the number of teachers.
    Concerning minimum graduation requirements, I don’t know of anyone on the BOE (although I don’t speak for them) who would suggest that we should provide merely a minimum to our students--- they deserve far more than that. That’s why we worked as hard as we did insisting that student programs not be eliminated to try to balance the budget. That’s also why I pushed for the BOE to provide a sense that we were opposed to cutting middle school academically talented and that we would object to anything less than full-day kindergarten.
    As for the claims that the “truth” about the budget needs to be disclosed, I would gladly answer any questions that I can, but I need a little bit of guidance as to what budgetary aspects the poster feels are not being revealed.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Wow... after reading this thread, it is absolutely obvious. We need someone with excellent managerial skills to lead our schools. What I really see here is low, BOTTOM low, morale. Morale at central office... morale in our schools. Can you only imagine what the runoff is for the kids? It's not so easy to say "Grow up" to someone who is feeling threatened by something or someone in a work environment that is nonsupportive. That goes for the top, too. I'll be honest here. Let's look at the criticism even the superintendent is subjected to before she even starts. Talk about contributing to low morale. Dr. Marks has to have a very thick skin to deal with this sort of thing. And no.. it's not about GROW UP. Everyone needs to be appreciated. Everyone. Everyone wants to know that he/she is doing a good job. Right now, there is nothing but negativism permeating our school district. Don't get me wrong, accountability is definitely what the doctor calls for, but certainly not when it is delivered willy-nilly without the support mechanisms in place to balance productivity. Teachers rarely have input in their own district, when in fact, Bruce Kimmel is lauded for his. I gather our teachers should run for BOE members in NYC to give input where it might be appreciated. Odd, isn't it? Morale should be the focus here. Nothing good comes out of anyone who does not feel good about him/herself.

    ReplyDelete
  29. One can only hope that someone has been brutally honest with Susan Marks concerning the morale issue in the NPS. It is a tough thing to be forthright about, and denial is the easy way out. Low morale has been the 800 pound gorilla in the room for many years, and it won't take long for Dr. Marks to see it firsthand. If she tackles it head-on, the school system will gradually change for the better.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Readers, please stay focused on the Susan Marks and the budget, study hall. There is a lot of discussion about former employees which is inappropriate.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Thank you Steve for your well-reasoned response and continued open communication.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Steve, you have to admit, that after all the tactics involved, by all interests, poof, walla, "its a cool." "Everything is kosher, move along nothing to see here," just leaves a bad taste in one's mouth. Million here million there. Keep em guessing and give them a target, isn't quite as progressive and transparent as many are, yourself included, it was thought, working toward. Where did the money come from? As Deep throat used to say follow the money. So, how did we magically uncover, (5 MILLION) cashola buckaroos. Thats a trick we need to teach the students.

    ReplyDelete
  33. As someone out in the trenches, we are cautiously optimistic about Susan Marks. I hope that she can come in, bring a fresh start, and weed out some of the malignancies at Central Office.

    Morale is important. We try to keep our teachers isolated from what comes out of the BOE offices. Shouldn't have to be this way.

    Sure, we aren't perfect and we could do some things better. Show us the way!

    ReplyDelete
  34. Sure I will respond to that sincere request.

    Be open and transparent.

    It is really that simple.

    Keep us informed and when you have issues dont dimisss, ignore or sweep them under the carpet.

    We know the challeges are steep mountian to climb and believe or not if you guys got your acts together you may just discover an army of support standing behind and next to you, instead of angry faces illumintated eerily by torches.

    Enormous resource are out here, if you guys in central just leveled with us, who knows you may just get a rally of support going.

    But the secrecey, its really bad P.R.

    Those in the know, do understand what you guys in central are facing, but could we accomplsh more and more rapidly is we leveled with everyone. The idea here is to get the folks to rally to suppot the district.

    But when we are playing petty office politics and pitting one againts another, well imagine if we could harness all that energy into positive pursuits reaching out and involveing everyone.

    Amazing accomplishmenst are possible.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Steve, thank you for the response.

    There are several aspects about the study hall situation that concern me: First, the number of students who have more than one study hall on average each day. Second, the demographics of those students. And third, the educational impact of allowing high school students to arrive late and leave early.

    My sister-in-law is a physics teacher in Delaware, one of the first-round winners of Race to the Top $$$. A few years ago, at dinner, she gave me the strangest look when I mentioned that many Norwalk high school students have more than one study hall a week. Her district, which has a fair amount of poor students, did away with study halls some years ago -- the demands of the 21st Century required it. It wasn't all that expensive; what it required was creative scheduling and proper priorities.

    We are indeed behind the curve.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Sorry, in the second paragraph, I meant to say more than one study hall a day; not one study hall a week.

    ReplyDelete
  37. to June 11, 9:24 p.m. -

    The cuts that were made in the budget to balance it were all discussed at the Finance meeting the Thursday before they were voted on. Copies of the finalized list of cuts were available to the public at the Special Meeting that the Board had last Tuesday. There were about 30 or so people in the audience at that meeting. If I remember correctly, only one person spoke during the public speaking portion.

    I would imagine the list of the cuts and the full budget is available online at the NPS website.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Must've been packed out the door since those rooms cant hold twenty.

    See there is a slieght of hand to that.

    Hold the meetings without notification and if they continue find out and show up, hold the meetings in the smallest room, lock the windows so they cant be opened and either turn off the air conditioning or crank up the heat so no one can breath. A trick some credit Knopp with perfecting.

    Somewhere down the line, either folks are going to wise up, or, someone will come along in a wheel chair or oxygen mask, need one to breath in those rooms anyway and slap an access complaint on top of the dozens of other state and federal complaints.
    In the interim, watch the rabbit appear out of nowhere....
    Walla.....
    Cool huh?

    ReplyDelete
  39. I had asked for an extra week to allow for greater public comment on the proposed. When the consensus appeared to be that the hearing needed to be held sooner, rather than later, I scheduled the Finance Committe for 2 days after the BOE meeting. Was the scheduling ideal? Certainly not.
    But, the end result was that we had a good cross section of concerned citizens, teachers, staff, adminstrators, BOE members (other than Finance Committee members) and cental office officials.
    The meeting was held in the largest available room (and it was air-conditioned)-- the door was kept open and public comment and scrutiny were welcomed.
    I think that our working on understanding the basic budget assumptions and the means by which projections were forecasted helped us to find the responsible cuts that were needed to put the budget into balance.
    Once again, choices had to be made and the ones with the least direct impact on classrooms were chosen. But, to get to that point required months of work (which is why you elected us). We had meetings where we reviewed the role and budget needs of the literacy program, early childhood initiative, Human Resources Department, Human Relations staff, outside legal services requests and school-based issues (such as the role of assistant principals and social workers).
    Overall, the Finance Committee members worked hard to assess the true needs of all students in the district and to afford them the best possible educational opportunities given the limitations of the budget.

    ReplyDelete

ShareThis