Pages

Thursday, November 5, 2009

Steve Colarossi and the Naramake Family Resource Center

This is guest post by Steve Colarossi in response to comments on NorwalkNet.com about the Naramake Family Resource Center. It is posted here, not in the comments sections, because of its length.

Conventional wisdom dictates ignoring innuendo and annonymous malcontents. My desire to be open to the public, however, prompts my response to the absurd comments made by the various (or single) "Anonymous" parties.

But, as an initial caveat, please recognize that I am offering these comments as an individual (who is the subject of some silly innuendo) and not as a member of the Board of Directors of the Naramake Family Resource, Inc. (which is a non-profit corporation run by a Board of Directors). Furthermore, I am not the spokesperson for the Parents Not Politicians slate-- I was simply one candidate among four good people seeking to make the changes we needed for our public schools.

First, as far as I know, there have never been any allegations of "improprieties" regarding the operation of the Naramake FRC, Inc. In fact, the Board of Education annually has approved various initiatives of the Naramake FRC, Inc. and certifies that conditions have been met for certain grants that have been awarded to the FRC (but which are administered through the school department).

Secondly, I know of no Norwalk Public School administrator who is on the payroll of the Naramake FRC.

Third, these anonymous posters don't seem concerned about receiving the financials of any other non-profit which provides valuable services to our public school children, which have city officials on their Boards and which use school facilities. This point actually gives me some hope that the poster is really bent on a vendetta against me and is not intent on undermining the amazing partnerships which exist between the City of Norwalk, its schools and some great non-profits. Norwalk’s non-profits are indispensible to all segments of our diverse city—they provide an amazing array of services at no direct cost to our taxpayers.

Fourth, the alleged "educator" who feels that education should start in kindergarten is woefully misinformed about the need to start teaching kids from an earlier age. Because many at-risk children are born to parents who were, themselves, at-risk youths and who did not necessarily have positive school experiences, having school-based early childhood education programs helps in a variety of ways. You see, these programs help socialize children to school-life, provide critical early literacy and numeracy skills and have been found to reduce special education placements as children grow older. Furthermore, programs like the Naramake FRC provide parent education programs, as well as playgroups for much younger children; they help build a positive relationship between school and family. These programs help all members of our community at no direct cost to taxpayers.

Fifth, if you want to see a non-profit's tax returns, the information is publicly available. In fact, just to make sure that the information was publicly available, I looked at the Naramake FRC's returns, as well as the returns of other local non-profits through free, publicly available means. So, please, stop the nonsense of claiming that the information is not publicly available or that there is anything to hide. My hunch is that you know how to obtain that information, discovered nothing untoward in them but still want to see if you can spin some conspiracy tale out of nothing. Either that or you simply have no understanding of what it is you think you are looking for and are being completely misguided. Unfortunately, for those who want to hide behind anonymous comments, you can't expect to have documents mailed to you, now can you?

Sixth, the Naramake FRC provides a host of services to the school and its students. All the services, like the pre-school, are offered on a sliding scale (which is why different people pay different amounts). At least one program (the afterschool tutoring program) is offered free of charge.

Seventh, the Naramake FRC has been a valuable member of the community-- making donations to the school, providing babysitting services for school events held in the evening, offering vacation camps (which are a godsend for working families), leading parent education seminars at night (such as those to help parents promote reading at home and to provide guidance for behavioral issues) and co-sponsoring family events with the PTO. The before-school and after-school care programs are offered on a week-by-week basis which provides families significant flexibility (folks only need to sign up for the days they need on Thursday for the following Monday and do not need to pay for more than the one week in advance). Also their staff is always available when a family crisis occurs and a parent is going to be late to pick-up a child or must request last-minute before-school or after-school care.

Eighth, you understand that the Norwalk Board of Education has had several meetings to review the Naramake FRC as well as the city's other after-school programs. Many of the questions to which you are seeking answers are all contained within the public record. Once again, if you simply reviewed past BOE minutes you would have found the answers you seek, but then again you would not have enjoyed the few moments you have had to try to defame a great program that helps families and discredit me.

Ninth, if you have all these questions (and I do not mean to suggest that all your questions are mere baseless innuendo, although the fact that all of them are posted anonymously suggests more guile rather than concern) ask the families who use the FRC if they are paying more than the other programs in the city or if their children are not receiving quality before school and afterschool care. Sure, you won’t make your political points in public or see your “anonymous” name in print, but you would get first-hand information about a program for which you profess to have legitimate concerns.

Tenth, and finally, do you actually think that your bullying tactics are going to dissuade me from trying to help other school groups in forming their own programs to advance school-based early childhood education, or that you are going to discourage me from fighting for what is best for all of Norwalk's children? For years I stood before the Board of Education advocating for Naramake's children and now I have the opportunity to fight for all of Norwalk's children. Bullies and innuendo only encourage me to fight harder.

But, "anonymous", you already know that-- after all you're the reason I ran for the Board of Education and worked as hard as I did to make a difference for all of our kids, families and taxpayers.

Steven A. Colarossi
www.parentsforcolarossi.com
stevecolarossi@yahoo.com


[The contents of this article represent the views of the writer, not of NorwalkNet.com.]

25 comments:

  1. First, Moina thank you for reaching Steve and convincing him to write a response. Your blog is becoming a valuable resource for parents who care about their children's education at NPS.

    Second, Steve thank you for responding. I must begin however by taking issue with your remark about people posting their comments anonymously. As a lawyer you surely know that the First Amendment protects anonymous speech. Anonymous speech is at the foundation of our country's democracy. Many found fathers, Benjamin Franklin, for example wrote letters anonymously. I am anonymous by choice because I don't my views affecting my child's education. In short I am afraid of retaliation by those in power -- and now that includes you too.

    Second, I applaud and support the would of the FRC in the Naramake community. I would suggest however that by not being forthcoming about its finances the FRC is fueling the suspicions of its critics. The best thing to do to extinguish the flames is to just post the current finances on the web. Then everyone will see that there is nothing about nothing.

    Steve you've been given a great mandate by the voters of Norwalk to change the system of education in this town. It would be so easy to select a cookie-cutter administrator but I urge you to select someone and enact policies that will make Norwalk a national leader. We can do it here! Don't settle for mediocrity.

    I sense in the tone of your writing Steve a degree of emotion that will not serve you well in the longrun. Please be dispassionate (but forceful) in your approach to issues.

    I know you can get the job done.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The information is publicly available. They've been forthcoming. They've been before the BOE a few times.
    Look it up for yourself, figure out if you think anything is wrong and then make your claims.
    Or, do you want Steve to get the docs for you and then hire a CPA to help you understand the returns?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Steve,

    I am one of anonymous responders (the alleged educator who taught 3rd grade in the Pittsburgh area for 6 years). Yes, I do understand the importance of early education and the difference quality pre-school education makes.

    Did you read my comments or just ready for attack? If you read what I wrote, I suggested that you dispel the innuendo made by a prior post so that more important issues could be addressed.

    I actually voted for you based on the recommendation of a friend whose children attend Naramake.

    Sorry for voicing my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It's been a long week, tgif.

    Everyone take a breath, catch up on missed sleep.

    We have some seriously challenging issues before us. Let us stay focused and not let ourselves get sidetracked on non issues.

    We have a superintendednt to hire and a school system in dire need of not just a tune up but a complete overhaul.

    One step at a time.

    ReplyDelete
  5. A year or two ago, while I was on the Board of Education, I was surprised when several board members raised a host of questions about the Naramake Family Resource Center. I had no idea why they were so concerned.

    When pressed, they suggested that the reason for their interest was the Center's tax exempt status; specifically, they wanted to see evidence that the Board, years ago, actually conferred that status.

    I sat through these discussions (which covered several meetings) more than a little perplexed, not sure why anyone would bother with such a small point, especially since everyone stipulated that the Resource Center was doing an excellent job.

    The director and someone from the Resource Center's Board of Directors came to these meetings and answered every question that was posed. As requested, they even presented tax returns -- boring reading, by the way -- for a number of years.

    After listening to my colleagues on the Board over the course of these meetings, I still couldn't figure out why a few of them were so concerned about this tax exemption. At times it even seemed they were angry at the Resource Center personnel who appeared before the Board.

    In hindsight, I believe these discussions took place around the time that the Board was considering a plan to improve the quality and fairness of the various before- and after-school programs in the school system.

    I wholeheartedly supported this plan, the goal of which was to create a uniform payment plan and curriculum for every one of these programs in the system. The idea that before- and after-school costs varied from school to school seemed patently unfair to me.

    Once again, I was perplexed when the Board rejected this plan. Later on, several people told me that the real issue was not the creation of a uniform plan, but creating and saving jobs. I certainly hope that was not the case.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks for the intelligent and informative response. It seems to me that this is all that was requested in the first place.

    I agree with Sojourner that perhaps it has simply been too long of a week and I am sure the candidates are exhausted.

    Let's stop the intense arguments and focus on the tasks at hand.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Steve's approach is caustic and toxic. I am wondering if when I approach the board with a concern if Steve is going to react in this manner towards me? If the new board is going to start improving communication maybe they need to start by making sure this kind of non-collaborative tone is put under control.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I haven't always agreed with Mr. Colorassi, but I don't doubt that he will communicate openly. I also believe that he will, at the very least, consider the input of the many in making his individual voting decisions on the Norwalk Board of Education. As for his approach in response to an attack about the Naramake FRC, I read it as direct and reasoned, not caustic and toxic.

    I agree with him that there is the possibility that these harsh postings may actually be the work of one person, someone who obviously lacks trust in Mr. Colarossi. Well, he has been elected and so what we must now do is observe his actions on the board. If anyone believes that there is anything improper being done by individuals involved with the FRC, there are legal channels, they taking that path is going to require specific information, not wild speculation.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I made a typographical error in the last sentence above, which should read:

    If anyone believes that there is anything improper being done by individuals involved with the FRC, there are legal channels, but taking that path is going to require specific information, not wild speculation.

    (Also, there is a problem with the time stamp that this site put on my posting. It is 5:00 a.m., not 2:00 a.m.)

    ReplyDelete
  10. I wrote the comment about Steve's "approach" being caustic and toxic. Frankly, I have no background on the Neramack FRC - and that's not my concern. My concern stems from how he communicates. If this is his method of open direct communication I am concerned that he will handle views of dissent with the same "direct you-dummy" style. This kind of tone and attitude does not bode well in building communication with parents. It's hard to listen to the facts he presents when he colors them judgments and "you dummy" tone.

    Imagine, if one anonymous poster is getting under his skin in a blog site how much more will he use his offensive "open-I say what's on my mind" and "direct-you are a dummy parent" style will come out when the many emotional parents approach him with issues?

    The ball is in Steve's court. I hope he evaluates his approach and correct his communication style to maximize the My hope is that he develops the self control that is needed to manage the emotional responses from parents in constructive way. If he does not control his communication style, his tenure may serve as a model of how not to be a Board of Education official.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Last paragraph again...

    The ball is in Steve's court. I hope he evaluates his approach and correct his communication style to maximize his effectiveness. My hope is that he develops the self control that is needed to manage the emotional responses from parents in constructive way. If he does not control his communication style, his tenure may serve as a model of how not to be a Board of Education official.

    ReplyDelete
  12. To Anonymous November 6, 2009 4:40 AM :

    You are A SORE LOSER !!! Take your ONE VOICE elsewhere.

    Bravo to Mr. Colorassi !!

    Fiscal Sanity, not frivolous Spendthrift administration.

    ReplyDelete
  13. No, anonymous is not one person. I join at least one other 'anonymous' and object to being called a bully and a person who has some sort of vendetta against Steve Colorossi. (I hope we are not dealing with paranoia here....)

    Mr. Colorossi, could we see a list of employees and how long they have been on the payroll? Is there and/or was there a Norwalk principal (or former principal) on the payroll? I am wondering if this is the reason the BOE was so interested in the finances. Don't leave the parents guessing. Clear it up openly.

    Just post he truth. Don't ask people to find it for themselves....I thought this was about open communication. Start now....

    ReplyDelete
  14. Where does one go to find public records for tax returns and old minutes?

    ReplyDelete
  15. www.guidestar.org has 990s for most US non-profits as well as compensation for every employee over $75K. It's not free though.

    I agree that Steven Colarossi has the potential of becoming a huge asset to the BOE but only if he overcomes his argumentative tendencies and arrogance.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I understand Mr. Colarossi is on the Board of Directos at the Family Resource Center. They are a 501 CB and not a part of the Norwalk Public Schools. They are a private, non-profit organization who use Naramake School without paying anything to the school system. They occupy two classrooms and are charging parents. Norwalk taxpayers are paying approx. $80,000 for a portable classroom because they exist.
    Last year the BOE asked for financial records to see how much money wss paid to directors and to the principal. Mr. Henry refused to give statements (financial).
    Parents, ask yourself why does the resource center own a car?
    If any of this is untrue, I appologize. Mr. Colorossi, please feel free to correct anything that is not factual.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Does any other school use 2 classrooms for after and before school programs?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Why are the above questions not being answered? Is what is stated true?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Thank you, Bruce, for an intelligent and respectful response. Mr. Colarossi seems defensive and as usual, patronizing in his responses. I hope that this is not what we have to look forward to during his term on the BOE.

    Thanks also to the posters above for clarifying the questions. Why would Mr. Henry refuse to give information?

    ReplyDelete
  20. Perhaps these questions would be better posed and answered at the BOE meetings, not on an anonymous blog. If people have concerns, they should speak up in the proper forums and they will get the answers that they seek. What about the FRC at Fox Run, are they paying anything? The preschool at Marvin School?

    It just seems odd that this is being brought to the fore now, AFTER the election was held. There was plenty of opportunity to bring this to light in the many discussions on this board, and the other blogs, opinion pages in newspapers, debates and other forums that occured before the election.

    Personally, I must say that this is sad. I find that with all the in-fighting and petty bickering, it feels disheartening that there will be any real change in the Norwalk education system. We better start saving for private school.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Still waiting for a response from Mr. Colarossi.....

    Open communication?????????????

    ReplyDelete
  22. The Fox Run Family Center is a part of the Norwalk Public Schools, in answer to a question above. That is a BIG difference from the privately owned Naramake Resource Center.

    What is with the car? Is there an answer to that? Who drives it?

    ReplyDelete
  23. These questions deserve an answer. Mr Carlorossi, you have much to say when you want to answer a question. What about when the hard questiosn are being asked of you now? How much did you earn last year as a FRC board member? How much did Bob Hnery make and why woud he not dsiclose his 1099 as the mayor urged hi to do. Why do they own a car? Quit hiding.

    Are they making so much money that they can't spend it all? If so maybe the Bd of Ed should charge them rent or kick them out so the children who attend K - 5 can sit in their own building. Let them rent somewhere else. WHere are the answers?

    ReplyDelete
  24. Anonymous accusations do not deserve a reply. I have worked with many non-profits and never heard of Board members receiving compensation.
    Instead of making scurrilous accusations, I suggest the anonymous complainer ask Mr. Colarossi in writing or go look up the tax returns. These are public information, although there will likely be a charge.

    ReplyDelete
  25. There is more than one 'anonymous complainer' and the questions are not being answered. Mr. Colarossi is about to be a new Board member. It would be in his best interest to answer these questions even if they are anonymous. Open answers would clear the air once and for all. Why would anyone object if the accusations are truly 'scurrilous?' Just answer all the questions.

    ReplyDelete

ShareThis